<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.145 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733) › 2.145

# 御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演 2.145

御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演 2.145

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.145](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.145)

經。於前福德百分至所不能及　演曰。此正校量分持經福以為百分全舉施福不及其一。千等亦爾。此中文略。魏本云。百分千分百千萬分。歌羅分數分憂波尼沙陀分。乃至算數譬喻所不能及。貞觀等本廣略有異。教法不同不可一准。彼論偈云。

> Sūtra: “Compared to the former merit, a hundredth part \[…\] is not able to reach.”  
> Exposition: This is the actual comparative evaluation. Dividing the merit of upholding the sūtra into a hundred parts, the totality of the merit of giving does not equal even one of them. A thousand parts and the rest are also like this. In this text, the wording is abbreviated. The Wei translation says: “A hundredth part, a thousandth part, a hundred-thousandth part, a kalā part, a fractional part, an upaniṣad part, even up to calculation and analogy cannot reach.” The Zhenguan and other versions have differences in detail and brevity; the teachings are not uniform and cannot be judged by a single standard. The verse of that treatise says:  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.144](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.144)
- [Next: 2.146](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.146)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733~en-mt.2.145) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.145](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.145) · Pramāṇa
