[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733) › 2.80 # 御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演 2.80 御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演 2.80 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.80](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.80) 經。若有人言至三菩提　演曰。第三佛不得菩提。論云。或言燃燈如來所於法不得正覺。世尊後時自得正覺為離此取故。經言等。或者以法不可說故。燃燈佛時不證菩提唯得遠記者。後成佛時既證菩提。應有實法得正覺耶。故破此疑得後菩提。亦無有法。彼論頌云。菩提彼行等。此義云何。彼菩薩行。若人言有實者。此則虛妄。如是如來阿耨菩提。若人言得者。此亦虛妄。故言菩提彼行等。演曰。前說無實菩薩能行。行者今菩提亦然。無有實法故。言菩提與彼行等正同。此論以有難言因非勝上不得菩提果位殊勝得菩提耶。故有此文。又由次前云真如非一向無故。若爾佛有得耶。有此文起。 > Sūtra: "If a person says \[…\] \[the Tathāgata attained anuttarā samyak\]saṃbodhi." > Exposition: Third: the Buddha does not attain bodhi. The treatise says: "Someone might say that under Dīpaṃkara Tathāgata, he did not attain correct awakening regarding the Dharma, but the World-Honoured One later attained correct awakening by himself. To abandon this attachment, the sūtra says and so on." Someone might think: because the Dharma cannot be spoken, at the time of Dīpaṃkara Buddha he did not realize bodhi but only received a distant prophecy; when he later became a Buddha, since he realized bodhi, should there be a real dharma by which he attained correct awakening? Therefore, to shatter this doubt, even in attaining bodhi later, there is also no dharma. That treatise's verse says: "Bodhi is equal to that practice." What does this mean? If someone says that that bodhisattva practice truly exists, this is false; likewise, if someone says the Tathāgata attained anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, this is also false. Hence it is said: "Bodhi is equal to that practice." Exposition: Previously it was said that there is no real bodhisattva capable of practicing; now bodhi is also like this, because there is no real dharma. Thus it is said that bodhi is exactly equal to that practice. In this treatise, because of the objection: "The cause was not supreme and did not attain bodhi; does the fruit stage, being distinctive and supreme, attain bodhi?" this text is therefore present. Furthermore, because immediately before it was said that tathatā is not utterly non-existent, \[one might ask\]: if so, did the Buddha attain anything? Hence this text arises. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.79](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.79) - [Next: 2.81](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.81) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733~en-mt.2.80) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (2) - [金剛般若經疏論纂要](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1701.2.95) — Classical Chinese - [金剛般若論會釋](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.2.68) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.80](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.80) · Pramāṇa