[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛般若經旨贊](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735) › 2.165 # 金剛般若經旨贊 2.165 金剛般若經旨贊 2.165 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.165](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.165) 經。須菩提至為無所得耶　贊曰。次下第二明正覺心。顯第十九有得證果疑。修菩提勝因果行前明念處大悲為首。大悲之智必由果圓果滿滿來順成正覺。欲成正覺即令修行有為無為無上妙行。而諸菩薩不離我法。不能如佛具此二行。返疑佛行非無上行。作是疑云。何故如來離無所得及無所行。此上上證依展轉行有得行□證菩提。而今令我行二行耶。由執故雖行而乖正覺。由疑故復不欲修行。今欲顯彼疑執之心故說真理。雖無一法可修。若離俗諦修行方便無由彼證。無著約除執而令學名正覺心。天親就顯疑而令修名顯有得證果疑。文下為二。初善現發問。後如來即答。此初也。三僧祇劫二諦雙修。所成正覺若因若果。豈非為彼無所得耶。 > Sūtra: “Subhūti \[…\] is it that nothing was attained?” > > Praise: Next below, second, explaining the mind of correct awakening reveals the nineteenth doubt, \[namely\] the doubt about attaining the realization of the fruit. Cultivating the superior causes, fruit, and practices of bodhi, previously the station of mindfulness with great compassion at the head was explained; the wisdom of great compassion must be completed by the fruit. When the fruit is fully completed, it accords with the accomplishment of correct awakening. Wishing to accomplish correct awakening, one is caused to cultivate unexcelled, wondrous practices, both conditioned and unconditioned. Yet all bodhisattvas are not free from self and dharmas; unable to possess these two practices like the Buddha, they conversely doubt that the Buddha's practices are the unexcelled practice, forming this doubt: “Why would the Tathāgata be free from having nothing attained and nothing practiced? This highest realization relies on successive practices, having practices with attainment \[…\] realization of bodhi; why now do you cause me to practice these two practices?” Due to grasping, although they practice, they run contrary to correct awakening; due to doubt, they moreover do not wish to cultivate. Now, wishing to reveal their minds of doubt and grasping, \[the Buddha\] therefore speaks of the true principle: although there is not a single dharma that can be cultivated, if one is apart from the conventional truth and the expedients of practice, there is no way to realize it. Asaṅga, in terms of removing grasping and causing one to learn, terms this the “mind of correct awakening”; Vasubandhu, with respect to revealing the doubt and causing one to cultivate, terms this “revealing the doubt about attaining the realization of the fruit.” In the text below, there are two parts: first, Subhūti raises the question, and afterward, the Tathāgata immediately answers. This is the first: throughout three asaṃkhyeya kalpas doubly cultivating the two truths, as for the accomplished correct awakening, whether cause or fruit, is it not indeed that nothing was attained? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.164](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.164) - [Next: 2.166](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.166) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735~en-mt.2.165) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.165](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.165) · Pramāṇa