<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.189 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛般若經旨贊](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735) › 2.189

# 金剛般若經旨贊 2.189

金剛般若經旨贊 2.189

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.189](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.189)

經。須菩提至即非有我　贊曰。下簡異中復有三。初佛知無。次凡疑有。後破凡愚。此初也。言有我者。是有我執。非有我者。是無我執。有所執我可有我執。所我既無何有所執。即本無我而妄生執名為我執。既無我執佛何故說。

> Sūtra: "Subhūti... there is no self." / Commentary: In the distinction below, there are again three parts: first, the Buddha's knowing non-existence; next, the ordinary person's doubting existence; finally, refuting the foolish ordinary person. This is the first. Saying 'there is a self' refers to self-grasping; 'there is no self' refers to the absence of self-grasping. If there were a grasped self, there could be self-grasping; since the grasped self is already non-existent, how could there be an object of grasping? That is, originally there is no self, yet one falsely gives rise to grasping: this is called 'self-grasping.' Since there is no self-grasping, why does the Buddha speak \[of it\]?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.188](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.188)
- [Next: 2.190](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.190)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735~en-mt.2.189) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.189](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.189) · Pramāṇa
