<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.235 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛般若經旨贊](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735) › 2.235

# 金剛般若經旨贊 2.235

金剛般若經旨贊 2.235

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.235](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.235)

經。須菩提至所說義不　贊曰。下明如所不分別即無能見。前破我法所緣之境。今破能緣我法見心。見心乃是所起分別。今翻令作無分別心故。言如所不分別也。文中分四。問答徵釋。此初也。佛說我見有其二空。一為安置人無我理。謂顯無有所執我相。但有虛妄我見心故。二為安置法無我理。謂我見體亦非實法所見。既無能見無故。如是觀察實無二見。能取心者。即是相應三摩鉢底之方便也。非謂知無所取我法為能見心為入方便故。論頌云。

> Sūtra: "Subhūti... the meaning of what was said?" Commentary: Below is clarified non-conceptualization as it is, namely, having no subjective seeing. The preceding text refuted the objective realms grasped as self and dharmas; now it refutes the subjective seeing mind that grasps self and dharmas. The seeing mind is that which arouses conceptualization; now, turning it around to make it a non-conceptual mind, it is therefore called "non-conceptualization as it is." In the text there are four parts: questioning, answering, inquiring, and explaining. This is the first. The Buddha's speaking of the view of a self has two emptinesses: first, to establish the principle of the selflessness of persons, meaning that it reveals that there is no clung-to mark of a self, but only a false mind of the view of a self; second, to establish the principle of the selflessness of dharmas, meaning that the substance of the view of a self is also not a real dharma. The seen being non-existent, the subjective seer is also non-existent; contemplating in this way that there are truly no two views or grasping mind is the skillful means for corresponding samāpatti. It is not that knowing the absence of grasped self and dharmas constitutes the seeing mind as an entry through skillful means. Therefore, the verse in the treatise says:  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.234](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.234)
- [Next: 2.236](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.236)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735~en-mt.2.235) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (2)

- [金剛經纂要刊定記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.7.74) — Classical Chinese
- [御注金剛般若波羅蜜經宣演](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2733.2.211) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.235](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.235) · Pramāṇa
