[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛般若經旨贊](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735) › 2.61 # 金剛般若經旨贊 2.61 金剛般若經旨贊 2.61 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.61) 謂證果時雖復不住言說之道。而言說道亦能為因得佛果也。則以諸佛有四實智。依實而語無虛妄故。言真語者。總說俗諦為顯世諦。是虛妄相唯修實智。是真實故。言實語者。別說俗諦。謂說小乘四諦之行。此苦集是煩惱行。此滅道行是清淨故。言如語者。總說真諦。謂法無我第一義諦。是說大乘平等法故。言不異語者。別說真諦。授記三世。依真修行所得之果。記住無住行及當果淨非淨故。不作是釋。兩論相違。名有義者。寧成會釋。其不誑語譯者。妄加論及餘經皆不舉故。故天親論而說頌云。 > This means that although at the time of realizing the fruit one does not abide in the path of verbal discourse, the path of verbal discourse can nevertheless serve as the cause for attaining the fruit of buddhahood. This is because the Buddhas possess four kinds of true wisdom, and they speak according to truth without falsehood. As for “one who speaks the truth \[zhen\]”: it speaks generally of conventional truth to reveal that worldly truth is of false and deceptive marks, and only cultivating true wisdom is real. As for “one who speaks the real \[shi\]”: it speaks specifically of conventional truth, referring to expounding the practices of the Four Noble Truths of the Hīnayāna: that suffering and origin are practices of defilement, and that cessation and path are practices of purity. As for “one who speaks thusness \[ru\]”: it speaks generally of ultimate truth, referring to the ultimate truth of the selflessness of phenomena, because it expounds the equal Dharma of the Mahāyāna. As for “one who speaks without divergence \[buyi\]”: it speaks specifically of ultimate truth, giving prophecies across the three times of the fruits obtained by cultivating practice based on the truth, prophesying the practices of abiding and non-abiding and whether the future fruits are pure or not pure. If one does not explain it in this way, the two treatises would contradict each other. For someone to be considered an authority, how could one fail to harmonize them? The phrase “one who does not deceive \[bukuang\]” was falsely added by the translator; neither the treatise nor other sūtras mention it. Therefore, Vasubandhu’s treatise gives a verse, saying: > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.60) - [Next: 2.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.62) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735~en-mt.2.61) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2735.2.61) · Pramāṇa