[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2738) › 1.5 # 金剛經疏 1.5 金剛經疏 1.5 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2738.1.5) 經曰。何以故我於往昔至應生嗔恨者證也。更曉無苦義。節節支解害事極也。不生嗔恨忍力猛也。嗔恨因我執而生。我執既無嗔恨。從誰而作。然嗔是大惑。恨是小纏。大惑即可報之以殺心。小纏但可加之以楚毒。由嗔具五義故名大。恨不具故名小。如心說。 > The sūtra's 'Why is this? In the past when I…' up to 'would have given rise to anger and hatred' is the verification. It further clarifies the meaning of the absence of suffering. The dismemberment limb by limb was an extreme act of harm; not giving rise to anger or hatred shows that the power of endurance was fierce. Anger and hatred arise because of grasping at a self; since self-grasping is absent, from whom could anger and hatred arise? However, anger is a major affliction, while hatred is a minor entanglement. With a major affliction, one can retaliate with murderous intent; with a minor entanglement, one only inflicts painful suffering. Because anger possesses five meanings, it is called major; because hatred does not possess them, it is called minor, as explained in the treatise on mind. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2738.1.4) - [Next: 1.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2738.1.6) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2738.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2738~en-mt.1.5) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2738.1.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2738.1.5) · Pramāṇa