[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [淨名經集解關中疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777) › 1.536 # 淨名經集解關中疏 1.536 淨名經集解關中疏 1.536 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.536](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777.1.536) 若以無生得授記者。無生即是正位。於正位中亦無授記。亦無得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。云何彌勒受一生記乎　此二約無生門彈文二。初約理破。二約行破。此初也。肇曰。上推有生無記。此推無生亦無無生。即七住無相真正法位也。此位為理無記。無成彌勒於何授一生記乎。 > "If the prophecy is received by means of non-birth, non-birth is the correct status. Within the correct status there is neither prophecy nor the attainment of anuttarā-samyak-saṃbodhi. How then could Maitreya receive a prophecy of one birth?" This is the second part, reproaching in terms of the gateway of non-birth; the text has two parts. First, refuting in terms of principle; second, refuting in terms of practice. This is the first. Sengzhao says: "Above he investigated that in having birth there is no prophecy; here he investigates that in non-birth there is also none. Non-birth is the signless, truly correct status of phenomena of the seventh abode. This status being principle, there is neither prophecy nor attainment. In what could Maitreya receive the prophecy of one birth?" > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.535](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777.1.535) - [Next: 1.537](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777.1.537) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777~en-mt.1.536) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [注維摩詰經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.4.30) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777.1.536](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777.1.536) · Pramāṇa