[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [淨名經集解關中疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777) › 2.105 # 淨名經集解關中疏 2.105 淨名經集解關中疏 2.105 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.105](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777.2.105) 又問。顛倒想孰為本　答曰。無住為本　此五問答也。無明住地妄心構立無別依住故名無住。肇曰。心猶水也。靜則有照。動則無鑒。癡愛所濁。邪風所扇涌溢波蕩未始暫住。此以觀法何住不到。譬臨面涌泉而責以本狀者未之有也。倒想之興。本乎不住。義存於此。 > He asked again: "What is the root of inverted notions?" He replied: "Non-abiding is the root." This is the fifth exchange. The entrenchment of ignorance is fabricated by the deluded mind, having no distinct support to abide in, hence named 'non-abiding'. Sengzhao says: "The mind is like water: when still, it reflects; when agitated, it has no clarity. Murky with folly and craving, fanned by perverse winds, surging and tossing, it has never abided for an instant. Using this to contemplate dharmas, what abiding would it not arrive at? It is like facing a surging spring and demanding its original appearance—this has never been possible. The arising of inverted notions is rooted in non-abiding; the meaning lies here." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.104](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777.2.104) - [Next: 2.106](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777.2.106) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777~en-mt.2.105) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [注維摩詰經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.6.188) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777.2.105](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2777.2.105) · Pramāṇa