[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分戒本疏卷第一．第二．第三](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2787) › 2.82 # 四分戒本疏卷第一．第二．第三 2.82 四分戒本疏卷第一．第二．第三 2.82 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.82](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2787.2.82) 乞縷使非親織戒第二十三　制意者。然三衣具足得資身。今乃自乞縷線以憑勢貴。彊逼織師織作三衣。長貪多欲。損惱織師。反譏謗。是故聖制　別緣有四。一自乞縷線。二是非親里俗人織師。三持勢遣織不與價直。四成便犯。已下正明戒本。此戒本跋難陀起過。故佛制戒。 > Precept 23: Begging for thread and causing an unrelated person to weave it. Intent of the formulation: With the three robes complete, one can sustain the body. Now, however, personally begging for thread and relying on the influence of the powerful, one forces a weaver to weave the three robes. This increases greed and abundant desire, harms and troubles the weaver, and contrarily invites ridicule and slander. Therefore the Sage formulated the rule. The specific conditions are four: 1. personally begging for thread; 2. the weaver is an unrelated layperson; 3. using influence to send \[thread\] to be woven without paying the cost; 4. completing \[the weaving\], whereupon the offense is committed. Below, the prātimokṣa text is properly clarified. This prātimokṣa rule arose from the misconduct of Upananda, for which the Buddha formulated the precept. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.81](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2787.2.81) - [Next: 2.83](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2787.2.83) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2787.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2787~en-mt.2.82) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2787.2.82](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2787.2.82) · Pramāṇa