[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [律戒本疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2788) › 1.1 # 律戒本疏 1.1 律戒本疏 1.1 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2788.1.1) 謂犯四重戒已捨梵行。聖果涅槃退沒墮落永無分也。不可悔除亦名波羅夷。是故說言。若受戒不還戒。戒羸不出行婬欲法犯重罪。不應共事。捨戒有十九事。是捨戒餘非捨戒。向內五眾及一切在家出家人說。是名捨戒。言義捨佛法僧辟支佛。捨學說。捨共住共利。捨經論。捨和上。捨比丘沙門釋子。非我比丘沙門釋子。我是沙彌外道。是俗人。增上戒定慧名為學。一切布薩名為說。清淨眾似清淨眾共住通名共住。共利法財利名為共利。九部經名經論。若言義捨過去未來佛犯偷不名捨戒。若直言捨佛是名捨戒。貪欲捨佛假言捨外道佛犯偷。若戲咲越毘尼。捨學捨僧捨說捨共住捨共利捨經論捨辟支佛捨和上。如捨佛中說。法是涅槃無三世故。若直言捨法。若言捨三世法。是名捨戒。假言捨外道法犯偷若言我捨阿者梨。不捨戒犯偷。若言我過去未來阿者利越毘尼。若言捨共財利。捨眾多比丘比丘尼亦如是。假言捨外道共財利犯偷。若言捨一一比丘比丘尼。及捨過去未來一一比丘比丘尼越毘尼。一切戲咲言捨戒越毘尼。誤說心狂無罪。若心念口言說戒戒戒羸事語語犯偷。羸已不捨行欲。罪如上說。 > This means that after violating the four grave precepts, one has abandoned brahmacarya. From the noble fruits and nirvāṇa one falls away and retrogresses, forever having no share in them. Because it cannot be removed through repentance, it is also called a pārājika. Therefore it is said: if one who has received the precepts does not return the precepts, and while experiencing weakness of precepts does not declare it, but engages in sexual intercourse, he commits a grave offense and one should not live in communion with him. In renunciation of the precepts there are nineteen items: these constitute renunciation of the precepts, while others do not constitute renunciation of the precepts. Declaring it to anyone among the internal fivefold assembly or to any lay or monastic person is called renunciation of the precepts. It means declaring renunciation of the Buddha, Dharma, Saṃgha, or pratyekabuddhas; renouncing the training (śikṣā) and the recitation \[of the prātimokṣa\]; renouncing common dwelling and common benefit; renouncing the sūtras and treatises; renouncing the upādhyāya; renouncing \[being a\] monk, śramaṇa, or Śākyan son; \[saying,\] 'I am not a monk, śramaṇa, or Śākyan son; I am a novice (śrāmaṇera), a non-Buddhist, or a layperson.' Higher morality, concentration, and wisdom are called the 'training'; all poṣadha observances are called the 'recitation'; dwelling together with the pure assembly or a seemingly pure assembly is collectively called 'common dwelling'; the benefits of Dharma and material wealth are called 'common benefit'; the nine classes of scriptures are called 'sūtras and treatises'. If one says that he renounces past or future Buddhas, he commits a sthūlāccaya and it is not called renunciation of the precepts. If he directly says that he renounces the Buddha, this is called renunciation of the precepts. If, out of lustful desire, he renounces the Buddha, but falsely says that he renounces a non-Buddhist Buddha, he commits a sthūlāccaya. If \[said\] in jest, it is a vinayātikrama. Renouncing the training, renouncing the Saṃgha, renouncing the recitation, renouncing common dwelling, renouncing common benefit, renouncing the sūtras and treatises, renouncing pratyekabuddhas, and renouncing the upādhyāya are explained as under renouncing the Buddha. The Dharma is nirvāṇa, and therefore does not have the three periods of time; hence whether one directly says that he renounces the Dharma, or says that he renounces the Dharma of the three periods of time, this is called renunciation of the precepts. If he falsely says that he renounces non-Buddhist dharmas, he commits a sthūlāccaya. If he says, 'I renounce the ācārya,' he does not renounce the precepts and commits a sthūlāccaya. If he says, 'My past or future ācāryas,' it is a vinayātikrama. If he says that he renounces common material benefits, or renounces many monks or nuns, it is also like this. If he falsely says that he renounces non-Buddhist common material benefits, he commits a sthūlāccaya. If he says that he renounces individual monks or nuns, or renounces past and future individual monks or nuns, it is a vinayātikrama. Any declaration in jest of renouncing the precepts is a vinayātikrama. If spoken by mistake or while insane of mind, there is no offense. If he mentally contemplates and orally speaks about the precepts, in matters concerning weakness of precepts, with every statement he commits a sthūlāccaya. If after \[experiencing\] weakness he does not renounce \[the precepts\] and engages in lustful acts, the offense is as stated above. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Next: 1.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2788.1.2) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2788.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2788~en-mt.1.1) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2788.1.1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2788.1.1) · Pramāṇa