[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四部律并論要用抄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795) › 2.13 # 四部律并論要用抄 2.13 四部律并論要用抄 2.13 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795.2.13) 十誦律第十誦毘尼序最下卷判衣物文　有一住處。舊比丘屬塔物自貸用。是丘比死。諸比丘不知當云何。以事白佛。佛言。衣鉢物還計直輸塔。殘者僧應分。有一住處比丘。衣物為塔用。是比丘死。諸比丘以是白佛。佛言。塔物還計直取現前僧分。比丘貸四方僧物私用。比丘私物貸四方僧用亦如是。客比丘舊住比丘亦如是。有一比丘。賒沽酒未償便死。酒主從諸比丘債酒價。諸比丘答言。此比丘在時何以不債酒價。酒主言。償我酒價。不償者出汝惡聲名。言釋種沙門飲酒。不肯償價。諸比丘不知云何。以是白佛。佛言。是比丘有衣鉢物應用償。若生無物應取僧物與償。何以故。恐出諸比丘聲名故。有客寄比丘衣物。比丘失去。時賈客往比丘邊索。比丘答言。失去。是事白佛。佛言。若自在不應償。若不得自在應償。有比丘以衣鉢物寄居士。居士失去。是事白佛。佛言。若好看失去不應。若不好看失去應償。憍薩羅有一住處。一比丘死。是比丘以衣鉢物寄比丘尼寺。比丘言。我等應分。比丘尼言。我等應分。諸比丘不知云何。以事白佛。佛言。以若比丘死前寄比丘尼。衣鉢物現前比丘僧應分。比丘尼寄比丘亦如是。佛在舍衛婆提國。釋子婆難陀比丘死。衣物直三十萬兩金。波斯匿王言。是人無兒子故是物應屬我。佛遣使波斯匿王言。賜城邑聚落人襄時頗少多與婆難陀不。王言不與。佛言。誰力故合得生活。皆是僧力故僧應取。王聞佛教好便正諸剎利言。是比丘與我同是剎利種。是衣物應屬我等。佛遣使語剎利言。汝作國事大官事頗問婆難陀不。答言。不問。婆難陀不在時汝作官事頗待不。答言。婆難陀共僧羯磨。婆難陀不在時僧不作羯磨。是衣物應屬僧。諸剎利聞教便止諸親族中表內外皆言。婆難陀是我伯叔父母舅甥兄弟。是衣鉢物應屬我等。佛遣使語言。汝等嫁女娶婦會同取與錢財時頗待婆難陀與分不。答言。不也。佛諸與婆難陀衣食分者應得。是衣分婆難陀僧與食故。是衣鉢應屬僧。諸親族聞佛教便止。婆難陀衣鉢物寄在餘處。是婆難陀於餘處死。寄物處比丘死處比丘各言。我應分此衣物。以是白佛。佛言。是衣鉢物在死處界內現前僧應分。又婆難陀衣鉢物處處出息與人。在異處人負其債。死後負債處死處諸比丘答言。我等應分。佛言。負債處界內現前僧應分。又婆難陀衣鉢物保出息餘處死餘處。出息餘處保住死。出息處保任處各言。是衣物應屬我等。佛言。保任處界內現前僧應分。又婆難陀衣鉢物出息貸質。各在異處死。是婆難陀死後。取錢處比丘質物比丘死處比丘各言。是物應屬我等。佛言。質物處界內現前僧應分。又婆難陀比丘死在異處。作券人亦在異處。取錢人復在異處。三處諍不息。佛言。手執券處界內現前僧應分。若手執券若質物。是二無異。佛在舍婆提牟羅破。求那比丘死。衣鉢物先寄長老阿難。求那比丘在餘處死。長老阿難復在餘處。所寄寄衣物復在異處。三處諸比丘各言。我應得。佛言。阿難在處界內現前僧應分。 > Text on adjudicating robe materials and possessions from the final fascicle of the 'Vinaya Preface' in the tenth recitation of the Daśādhyāya-vinaya: At a certain dwelling place, a resident monk borrowed property belonging to a stūpa for his own use. This monk died. The monks did not know what should be done. They reported the matter to the Buddha. The Buddha said: 'The value of the robe and bowl property should be calculated and repaid to the stūpa; whatever remains should be distributed by the saṃgha.' At a certain dwelling place, a monk used his own robes and property for a stūpa. This monk died. The monks reported this to the Buddha. The Buddha said: 'The property of the stūpa should be calculated in value, taken back, and distributed to the saṃmukhībhūta-saṃgha.' When a monk borrows property of the cāturdiśa-saṃgha for personal use, or when a monk's personal property is borrowed for use by the cāturdiśa-saṃgha, it is also like this. For visiting monks and resident monks, it is likewise. There was a monk who bought liquor on credit without paying and then died. The liquor seller demanded the price of the liquor from the monks. The monks replied: 'When this monk was alive, why did you not demand the price of the liquor?' The liquor seller said: 'Repay the price of my liquor! If you do not repay it, I will spread an evil reputation about you, saying, "The Śākya ascetics drink liquor and refuse to pay the price."' The monks did not know what to do and reported this to the Buddha. The Buddha said: 'If this monk has robe and bowl property, it should be used to repay it. If during his lifetime he had no property, saṃgha property should be taken to repay it. Why? Because of fear that a bad reputation will be spread about the monks.' A traveler deposited robes and property with a monk, and the monk lost them. Then the merchant went to the monk to demand them. The monk replied: 'I lost them.' This matter was reported to the Buddha. The Buddha said: 'If \[the traveler\] gave him full discretion, he need not repay; if he was not given full discretion, he must repay.' A monk deposited robe and bowl property with a householder, and the householder lost them. This matter was reported to the Buddha. The Buddha said: 'If he took good care of them and lost them, he need not repay; if he did not take good care of them and lost them, he must repay.' In Kosala there was a dwelling place where a monk died. This monk had deposited his robe and bowl property at a nunnery. The monks said: 'We should distribute it.' The nuns said: 'We should distribute it.' The monks did not know what to do and reported the matter to the Buddha. The Buddha said: 'If the monk deposited it with the nuns before his death, the robe and bowl property should be distributed by the saṃmukhībhūta-bhikṣu-saṃgha.' A nun depositing \[property\] with monks is also like this. When the Buddha was in the country of Śrāvastī, the monk Upananda the Śākyan died. His robes and property were worth three hundred thousand ounces of gold. King Prasenajit said: 'Because this man has no son, this property should belong to me.' The Buddha sent a messenger to say to King Prasenajit: 'When you bestowed \[favors\] on the people of cities, towns, and villages, did you ever give much or little to Upananda?' The king said: 'I did not give to him.' The Buddha said: 'Through whose power did he manage to sustain his livelihood? It was entirely through the power of the saṃgha; therefore the saṃgha should take it.' When the king heard the Buddha's teaching, he desisted. The kṣatriyas said: 'This monk was of the same kṣatriya clan as us; these robes and property should belong to us.' The Buddha sent a messenger to say to the kṣatriyas: 'When you conduct state affairs and the business of high officials, do you ever consult Upananda?' They replied: 'We do not consult him.' 'When Upananda is absent, when you conduct official business, do you ever wait for him?' They replied: '\[No.\]' 'Upananda performed karmans together with the saṃgha; when Upananda is absent, the saṃgha does not perform karmans. These robes and property should belong to the saṃgha.' When the kṣatriyas heard the teaching, they desisted. The relatives—maternal, paternal, agnates and cognates—all said: 'Upananda was our uncle, father, maternal uncle, nephew, or brother; this robe and bowl property should belong to us.' The Buddha sent a messenger to say to them: 'When you give daughters in marriage, take wives, assemble together, and give or take money and wealth, do you ever wait for Upananda to give him a share?' They replied: 'No.' 'The Buddha \[taught that\] those who share robes and food with Upananda ought to receive them. Upananda received his share of robes because the saṃgha gave him food; therefore these robes and bowls should belong to the saṃgha.' When the relatives heard the Buddha's teaching, they desisted. Upananda had deposited robe and bowl property in another place, and this Upananda died in yet another place. The monks at the place where the property was deposited and the monks at the place where he died each said: 'I should distribute these robes and property.' They reported this to the Buddha. The Buddha said: 'This robe and bowl property should be distributed by the saṃmukhībhūta-saṃgha within the sīmā of the place of death.' Furthermore, Upananda had lent out robe and bowl property at interest to people in various places. In a different place, people owed him debts. After his death, the monks at the place of the debt and at the place of death replied: 'We should distribute it.' The Buddha said: 'It should be distributed by the saṃmukhībhūta-saṃgha within the sīmā of the place of debt.' Furthermore, Upananda had robe and bowl property guaranteed and lent at interest in another place, and he died in another place. \[The monks where\] it was lent at interest in another place and where the guarantor lived and where he died—those at the place of lending and those at the place of guarantee each said: 'These robes and property should belong to us.' The Buddha said: 'It should be distributed by the saṃmukhībhūta-saṃgha within the sīmā of the place of guarantee.' Furthermore, Upananda had robe and bowl property lent at interest against a pledge, each in different places, and he died. After this Upananda died, the monks at the place where the money was taken, the monks at the place of the pledged property, and the monks at the place of death each said: 'This property should belong to us.' The Buddha said: 'It should be distributed by the saṃmukhībhūta-saṃgha within the sīmā of the place of the pledged property.' Furthermore, the monk Upananda died in a different place; the person who drew up the contract was also in a different place; and the person who took the money was again in a different place. The three places disputed without ceasing. The Buddha said: 'It should be distributed by the saṃmukhībhūta-saṃgha within the sīmā of the place where the contract is held in hand. Whether holding the contract in hand or \[holding\] the pledged property, these two are no different.' When the Buddha was at Śrāvastī in Mulapo (Mūlapoṣadha?), the monk Guṇa died. His robe and bowl property had previously been deposited with the Venerable Ānanda. The monk Guṇa died in another place; the Venerable Ānanda was in yet another place; and the deposited robes and property were again in a different place. The monks in the three places each said: 'I should receive it.' The Buddha said: 'It should be distributed by the saṃmukhībhūta-saṃgha within the sīmā of the place where Ānanda resides.' > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795.2.12) - [Next: 2.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795.2.14) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795~en-mt.2.13) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [十誦律](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.vinaya.other-vinayas.sarvastivada*zh-punyatara.61.180) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795.2.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795.2.13) · Pramāṇa