[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四部律并論要用抄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795) › 2.2 # 四部律并論要用抄 2.2 四部律并論要用抄 2.2 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795.2.2) 此重物者。以律文少異不同。致使末代比丘諍訟非一。原其大教正是一味。但聖旨分流偏執有闕。然行中非大過者隨情可爾。若欲判割輕重者。非律文不證也。若隨情解義容乖聖意。據文科判定無牟楯。故謹依四部律并論釋之。一處若欲施行。案文取斷。亦可各用隨部羯磨。 > Regarding heavy property, minor discrepancies and differences in the Vinaya texts have caused monks of later generations to engage in numerous disputes. At its source, the great teaching is of a single flavor, but as the holy intent diverged, one-sided attachments have led to deficiencies. Nevertheless, where practices do not involve grave errors, one may proceed as one sees fit. Yet if one wishes to determine and divide the light from the heavy, nothing can prove it except the Vinaya texts. If one interprets the meaning according to personal inclination, one risks violating the holy intent; but if one decides based on the textual classifications, there will certainly be no contradiction. Therefore, I respectfully explain it following the four Vinayas and their treatises. If one wishes to implement it in any place, one should judge by consulting the text; one may also use the karmans according to the respective schools. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795.2.1) - [Next: 2.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795.2.3) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795~en-mt.2.2) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795.2.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2795.2.2) · Pramāṇa