[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論分門記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801) › 2.151 # 瑜伽師地論分門記 2.151 瑜伽師地論分門記 2.151 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.151](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.151) 第四依勤修界差別觀尋思六事明修觀品分三。一總問。二廣答。三總結　廣答分六　一明於諸界尋思於義分三。一立因。二顯果分三。一標。二釋。三結。三總結　二明於諸界尋思其事分三。一立因。二顯果。三結　三明於諸界尋思其相分二。一明自相分二。一明正義分六如論。二結。二明共相分二。一明正義。二結　四明於諸界尋思於品分三。一思黑品分二。一立因。二顯果。二思白品。三結　五明於諸界尋思其時分三。一立因。二顯果。三結　六明於諸界尋思於理分二。一明觀待道理分三。一立喻。二法合分四。一明所依二明緣。三顯果。四明因。三總結。二合明餘三道理分二。一明正義分三。一明作用道理分二。一立因。二顯果。二明證成道理分三如論。三明法爾道理。第二明總結　第三總結。 > Fourth, the section explaining the cultivation of contemplation based on diligently cultivating the contemplation of the diversity of elements (dhātu) through inquiring into the six topics has three parts: 1. general question; 2. detailed answer; 3. general conclusion. The detailed answer has six parts: 1. explaining the inquiry into the meaning with regard to the elements has three parts: (1) establishing the cause; (2) revealing the result has three parts: i. designation; ii. explanation; iii. conclusion; (3) general conclusion; 2. explaining the inquiry into the fact with regard to the elements has three parts: (1) establishing the cause; (2) revealing the result; (3) conclusion; 3. explaining the inquiry into the characteristics with regard to the elements has two parts: (1) explaining the particular characteristic has two parts: i. explaining the correct meaning has six parts, as in the treatise; ii. conclusion; (2) explaining the common characteristic has two parts: i. explaining the correct meaning; ii. conclusion; 4. explaining the inquiry into the categories with regard to the elements has three parts: (1) inquiring into the dark category has two parts: i. establishing the cause; ii. revealing the result; (2) inquiring into the bright category; (3) conclusion; 5. explaining the inquiry into the time with regard to the elements has three parts: (1) establishing the cause; (2) revealing the result; (3) conclusion; 6. explaining the inquiry into the principles with regard to the elements has two parts: (1) explaining the principle of dependence (apekṣā-yukti) has three parts: i. establishing the metaphor; ii. applying it to the doctrine has four parts: a. explaining the basis; b. explaining the conditions (pratyaya); c. revealing the result; d. explaining the cause; iii. general conclusion; (2) jointly explaining the remaining three principles has two parts: i. explaining the correct meaning has three parts: a. explaining the principle of functional efficacy (kāryakāraṇa-yukti) has two parts: (a) establishing the cause; (b) revealing the result; b. explaining the principle of logical demonstration (upapattisādhana-yukti) has three parts, as in the treatise; c. explaining the principle of reality (dharmatā-yukti); ii. explaining the general conclusion. Third, general conclusion. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.150](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.150) - [Next: 2.152](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.152) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801~en-mt.2.151) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.151](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.151) · Pramāṇa