[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論分門記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801) › 2.19 # 瑜伽師地論分門記 2.19 瑜伽師地論分門記 2.19 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.19) 第二辯十種戒律儀虧損等相分二。一明虧損。二明圓滿。初文分六。一總標。二徵問。三列名分十如論。四別釋分十　一明初惡戒分三。一問。二答分二。一依因立過分五。謂前五種。二依果顯過分五。謂後五種。三結　二明太極沈下分三。一問。二答分二。一依無羞恥明沈下。二依慢緩明沈下。三結　三明太極浮散分三。一問。二答分三。一依非處惡作。二依輕蔑。三依惱害明浮散。三結　四明放逸懈怠所攝分三。一問。二答分二。一答放逸所攝分二。一明正義分五。一依過去。二依未來。三依現在。四依非先猛利。五依無護明放逸。二總結分五如論。二答懈怠所攝分二。一立因分五如論。二顯果。三結　五明起邪願分三。一問。二答分二。一依生天明邪願分二。一立因。二顯果。二依利養等明邪願分二。一立因。二顯果　三結　六明軌則虧損所攝分三。一問。二答分三。一立因分三如論。二顯果分二如論。三結　七明淨命虧損所攝分三。一問。二答分三。一立因分三如論。二顯果分五。一依矯詐。二依邪妄語。三依現相。四依研逼。五依以利求利明虧損。三明邪命義。三結　八明墮在二邊分三。一問。二答分二。一明樂邊分三。一立因。二顯果。三結。二明苦邊分三。一標。二釋分十如論。三結。三結　九明不能出離分三。一問。二答分二。一立邪因。二顯無異。三結　十明所受失壞分三。一問。二答分二。一立因。二顯果分三。一答正義。三引喻。三法合。三結　第五明總結　第六答難分二。一標經句。二釋經意分二。一標。二釋分二。一明艱離相。二明虧相　第二明戒圓滿相如論。 > Second, explaining the aspects of the ten kinds of deterioration, perfection, etc., of moral restraint has two parts: 1. Explaining deterioration; 2. Explaining perfection. The first section has six parts: 1. General statement; 2. Questioning examination; 3. Listing the names, divided into ten as in the treatise; 4. Separate explanations, divided into ten: \[i.\] Explaining initial bad morality has three parts: (1) Question; (2) Answer, which has two parts: \[a\] Establishing faults based on causes, divided into five, namely the first five types; \[b\] Revealing faults based on results, divided into five, namely the latter five types; (3) Conclusion. \[ii.\] Explaining extreme sinking has three parts: (1) Question; (2) Answer, which has two parts: \[a\] Explaining sinking based on shamelessness; \[b\] Explaining sinking based on laxity; (3) Conclusion. \[iii.\] Explaining extreme floating and dispersion has three parts: (1) Question; (2) Answer, which has three parts: \[a\] Based on inappropriate remorse; \[b\] Based on disrespect; \[c\] Explaining floating and dispersion based on harming; (3) Conclusion. \[iv.\] Explaining inclusion under heedlessness and indolence has three parts: (1) Question; (2) Answer, which has two parts: \[a\] Answering inclusion under heedlessness, which has two parts: \ Explaining the correct meaning, divided into five: \ Based on the past; \ Based on the future; \ Based on the present; \ Based on not having prior intense vigor; \ Explaining heedlessness based on lack of guarding; \ General conclusion, divided into five as in the treatise; \[b\] Answering inclusion under indolence, which has two parts: \ Establishing causes, divided into five as in the treatise; \ Revealing results; (3) Conclusion. \[v.\] Explaining the arising of wrong vows has three parts: (1) Question; (2) Answer, which has two parts: \[a\] Explaining wrong vows based on rebirth in heaven, which has two parts: \ Establishing causes; \ Revealing results; \[b\] Explaining wrong vows based on gain and support, etc., which has two parts: \ Establishing causes; \ Revealing results; (3) Conclusion. \[vi.\] Explaining inclusion under deterioration of conduct has three parts: (1) Question; (2) Answer, which has three parts: \[a\] Establishing causes, divided into three as in the treatise; \[b\] Revealing results, divided into two as in the treatise; \[c\] Conclusion. \[vii.\] Explaining inclusion under deterioration of pure livelihood has three parts: (1) Question; (2) Answer, which has three parts: \[a\] Establishing causes, divided into three as in the treatise; \[b\] Revealing results, divided into five: \ Based on deceit; \ Based on false speech; \ Based on extortion; \ Explaining deterioration based on seeking gain with gain; \[c\] Explaining the meaning of wrong livelihood; (3) Conclusion. \[viii.\] Explaining falling into the two extremes has three parts: (1) Question; (2) Answer, which has two parts: \[a\] Explaining the extreme of pleasure, which has three parts: \ Establishing causes; \ Revealing results; \ Conclusion; \[b\] Explaining the extreme of pain, which has three parts: \ Stating; \ Explaining, divided into ten as in the treatise; \ Conclusion; (3) Conclusion. \[ix.\] Explaining the inability to transcend has three parts: (1) Question; (2) Answer, which has two parts: \[a\] Establishing wrong causes; \[b\] Revealing the lack of distinction; (3) Conclusion. \[x.\] Explaining the ruin of what has been undertaken has three parts: (1) Question; (2) Answer, which has two parts: \[a\] Establishing causes; \[b\] Revealing results, which has three parts: \ Answering the correct meaning; \ Citing similes; \ Application of doctrines; (3) Conclusion. Fifth, explaining the general conclusion. Sixth, answering objections has two parts: 1. Citing the sūtra phrase; 2. Explaining the sūtra's purport, which has two parts: \[1\] Stating; \[2\] Explaining, which has two parts: \[a\] Explaining the aspect of difficult separation; \[b\] Explaining the aspect of deterioration. The second \[main part\], explaining the aspects of the perfection of morality, is as in the treatise. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.18) - [Next: 2.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.20) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801~en-mt.2.19) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.19) · Pramāṇa