<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.28 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論分門記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801) › 2.28

# 瑜伽師地論分門記 2.28

瑜伽師地論分門記 2.28

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.28)

第一明由正思擇食於所食分二。一明思擇分二。一問。二答分二。一立因。二顯果。二明食過患分三。一總問。二略答分三如論。三廣釋分三。一明觀食過。二觀食勝利。三明食體　初文分二。一廣解。二總結。初文分三。一明受用過分三。一問。二答分三。一明觀處。二明變位。三明厭想。三結。二明變異過分三。一問。二答分三。一依不淨生。示過分二。一立因。二顯果。分二。一明內不淨果。二明外不淨果。二依病生示過分二。一標。二釋。三依不消示過。三結。三明追求過分三。一總問。二略答分二。一標。二釋分六如論。三廣解分六。一明積集過分三。一問。二答分三。一明求飲食過。二明求飲食緣過。三明不遂過。三結。二明防護過分三。一問。二答分二。一立因。二顯果分八如論。三結。三明壞親愛過分三。一問。二答分二。一標。二釋分二。一立因。二顯果。三結。四明無厭足過分三。一問。二答分二。一依有力王明無厭足。二例餘明無厭足。三結。五明不自在所作過分三。一問。二答分二。一依君主。二例餘明不自在過。三結。六明起諸惡行過分三。一問。二答分二。一明惡行相分二。一明身惡行。二例餘。二明惡行果分二。一明現果。二明當果。三結。第二總結分三如論　第二明觀食勝利分五。一總標。二徵問。三略答。四廣解分二。一總問。二廣答分五。一依暫時住身明勝利分三。一觀壽量。二明唯修身暫住等失。三明不住暫住等德。二依領受飲食明勝利分二。一標。二釋分三。一明心劣想失。二明出離想。三受施法分二。一標。二釋分三。一報恩。二行平等行。三明修□。三依自持其心明勝利分二。一明違教法分二。一標。二釋分五如論。二明隨教法分二。一依不施明順法。二例餘四法明順法。四依命根明勝利分二。一立因。二顯果。五依不苦耽著明勝利分二。一立因。二顯果。五明總結　第三明食體分四。一總問。二略答。三列名。四明意趣分二。一略標說。二廣解分二。一明食體分二。一問。二答分二。一明食體。二明段義。二明食義分二。一標。二釋。

> The first explains eating food by proper reflection, in two parts: 1. explaining reflection, in two parts: (1) question; (2) answer, in two parts: a. establishing the cause, b. revealing the effect; 2. explaining the faults of food, in three parts: (1) general question; (2) brief answer, in three parts as in the treatise; (3) detailed explanation, in three parts: a. explaining contemplation of the faults of food, b. contemplation of the benefits of food, c. explaining the essence of food. The first text has two parts: (a) detailed explanation, (b) general conclusion. The first text has three parts: i. explaining the faults of consumption, in three parts: \[i\] question; \[ii\] answer, in three parts: \<1\> explaining the object of contemplation, \<2\> explaining the stages of transformation, \<3\> explaining the perception of revulsion; \[iii\] conclusion; ii. explaining the faults of transformation, in three parts: \[i\] question; \[ii\] answer, in three parts: \<1\> showing faults based on the generation of impurity, in two parts: \[1\] establishing the cause, \[2\] revealing the effect, in two parts: explaining the internal impure effect, explaining the external impure effect; \<2\> showing faults based on the generation of illness, in two parts: \[1\] heading, \[2\] explanation; \<3\> showing faults based on indigestion; \[iii\] conclusion; iii. explaining the faults of seeking \[food\], in three parts: \[i\] general question; \[ii\] brief answer, in two parts: \<1\> heading, \<2\> explanation, in six parts as in the treatise; \[iii\] detailed explanation, in six parts: \<1\> explaining the fault of hoarding, in three parts: \[1\] question; \[2\] answer, in three parts: explaining the fault of seeking food and drink, explaining the fault of seeking conditions for food and drink, explaining the fault of failure; \[3\] conclusion; \<2\> explaining the fault of guarding, in three parts: \[1\] question; \[2\] answer, in two parts: establishing the cause, revealing the effect, in eight parts as in the treatise; \[3\] conclusion; \<3\> explaining the fault of ruining affection, in three parts: \[1\] question; \[2\] answer, in two parts: heading, explanation, in two parts: \<a\> establishing the cause, \<b\> revealing the effect; \[3\] conclusion; \<4\> explaining the fault of lack of satiety, in three parts: \[1\] question; \[2\] answer, in two parts: explaining lack of satiety based on powerful kings, by analogy with others, explaining lack of satiety; \[3\] conclusion; \<5\> explaining the fault of actions done without autonomy, in three parts: \[1\] question; \[2\] answer, in two parts: based on rulers, by analogy with others, explaining the fault of lack of autonomy; \[3\] conclusion; \<6\> explaining the fault of giving rise to bad conduct, in three parts: \[1\] question; \[2\] answer, in two parts: explaining the marks of bad conduct, in two parts: \<a\> explaining bodily bad conduct, \<b\> by analogy with the rest; explaining the effects of bad conduct, in two parts: \<a\> explaining the present effect, \<b\> explaining the future effect; \[3\] conclusion. The second part, the general conclusion, is divided into three parts as in the treatise. The second section, explaining the contemplation of the benefits of food, has five parts: (a) general heading, (b) probing question, (c) brief answer, (d) detailed explanation, in two parts: i. general question; ii. detailed answer, in five parts: \[i\] explaining benefits based on the temporary subsistence of the body, in three parts: \<1\> contemplating the life-span, \<2\> explaining the faults of merely cultivating the temporary subsistence of the body and so forth, \<3\> explaining the virtues of not abiding in temporary subsistence and so forth; \[ii\] explaining benefits based on receiving food and drink, in two parts: \<1\> heading, \<2\> explanation, in three parts: explaining the fault of inferior thoughts of mind, explaining the thought of renunciation, the method of receiving alms, in two parts: \<a\> heading, \<b\> explanation, in three parts: \[a\] repaying kindness, \[b\] engaging in equanimous conduct, \[c\] explaining cultivating \[…\]; \[iii\] explaining benefits based on maintaining one's own mind, in two parts: \<1\> explaining violation of the Dharma of the teachings, in two parts: \[1\] heading, \[2\] explanation, in five parts as in the treatise; \<2\> explaining conforming to the Dharma of the teachings, in two parts: \[1\] explaining conformity based on non-giving, \[2\] by analogy with the other four dharmas, explaining conformity; \[iv\] explaining benefits based on the life-faculty, in two parts: \<1\> establishing the cause, \<2\> revealing the effect; \[v\] explaining benefits based on lack of painful craving, in two parts: \<1\> establishing the cause, \<2\> revealing the effect; (e) general conclusion. The third section, explaining the essence of food, has four parts: (a) general question, (b) brief answer, (c) enumeration of names, (d) explaining the underlying intent, in two parts: i. brief presentation; ii. detailed explanation, in two parts: \[i\] explaining the essence of food, in two parts: \<1\> question, \<2\> answer, in two parts: \[1\] explaining the essence of food, \[2\] explaining the meaning of mouthful \[food\]; \[ii\] explaining the meaning of food, in two parts: \<1\> heading, \<2\> explanation.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.27)
- [Next: 2.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.29)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801~en-mt.2.28) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.28) · Pramāṇa
