[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論分門記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801) › 2.65 # 瑜伽師地論分門記 2.65 瑜伽師地論分門記 2.65 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.65](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.65) 十四中第十三依惠捨明資糧義分二　一略釋分三。一總問。二略答。三結　二廣解分三。一總問分七。一問施主相。二問施田。三問施物體。四問施自性。五問施方便。六問施意趣。七問施性無罪相。二廣答分七　第一明施主相分三。一總標。二略釋。三廣解分二。一問。二答分二。一明施者相。二明施主相　第二明施田分四。一總標。二略答。三列名分四如論。四別釋分四。一依悲田明有苦相分三。一問。二答分九如論。三結。二依恩田明有恩相分三。一問。二答分十七如論。三結。三依愛田明親愛相分三。一問。二答分五如論。三結。四依德田明尊勝相分三。一問。二答分十一如論。三結　第三明施物體分四。一總標。二略釋。三廣解分二。一明有情施相分三。一問。二答分三。一明有情總體分二。一依他相續。二依自相續。二明開緣。三明無罪相分二。一明自在相。二明無罪義分三。一依無業果。二依無□□三依無損惱明無罪。三結。二明無情施相分五。一總問。二略答。三列名。四別釋分三。一明財物體分三。一標。二釋分十八如論。三結。二明穀物物體分三。一問。二答分十三如論。三結。三明處物體分三。一問。二答分六如論。三結。第五總結情非情二施　第四明施自性分三。一標。二釋答分二。一立因。二顯果。三結　第五明施方便分二。一問。二答分十五。一依淨信。二依正教。三依見果。四依殷重。五依恭敬。六依離慢。七依要用。八依平等。九依鮮潔。十依精妙。十一依淨物。十二依不損自他。十三依伏慳。十四依歡喜。十五依無悔明施方便　第六明為何義施分三。一標。二釋分四。一依悲田。二依恩田。三依愛田。四依德田明施意趣。三結　第七明施性無罪分三。一立因。二顯果分四如論。三結　第三明總結。 > Among the fourteen, the thirteenth clarifies the meaning of provisions based on giving, which has two parts: (1) brief explanation, which has three parts: (a) general question; (b) brief answer; (c) conclusion; (2) broad explanation, which has three parts: (a) general questions, which has seven parts: (i) asking about the characteristics of the donor; (ii) asking about the field of giving; (iii) asking about the substance of the given item; (iv) asking about the intrinsic nature of giving; (v) asking about the skillful means of giving; (vi) asking about the intention of giving; (vii) asking about the blameless nature of giving; (b) broad answers, which has seven parts: (i) the first clarifies the characteristics of the donor, which has three parts: \[A\] general presentation; \[B\] brief explanation; \[C\] broad explanation, which has two parts: \<1\> question; \<2\> answer, which has two parts: (aa) clarifying the characteristics of the giver; (bb) clarifying the characteristics of the donor (dānapati); (ii) the second clarifies the field of giving, which has four parts: \[A\] general presentation; \[B\] brief answer; \[C\] enumeration of terms, which has four parts, as in the treatise; \[D\] separate explanations, which has four parts: \<1\> based on the field of compassion, clarifying the characteristics of suffering, which has three parts: (aa) question; (bb) answer, which has nine parts, as in the treatise; (cc) conclusion; \<2\> based on the field of gratitude, clarifying the characteristics of having gratitude, which has three parts: (aa) question; (bb) answer, which has seventeen parts, as in the treatise; (cc) conclusion; \<3\> based on the field of affection, clarifying the characteristics of loved ones, which has three parts: (aa) question; (bb) answer, which has five parts, as in the treatise; (cc) conclusion; \<4\> based on the field of virtue, clarifying the characteristics of supremacy, which has three parts: (aa) question; (bb) answer, which has eleven parts, as in the treatise; (cc) conclusion; (iii) the third clarifies the substance of the given item, which has four parts: \[A\] general presentation; \[B\] brief explanation; \[C\] broad explanation, which has two parts: \<1\> clarifying the characteristics of giving animate beings, which has three parts: (aa) question; (bb) answer, which has three parts: (AA) clarifying the general substance of animate beings, which has two parts: (11) based on the mental continuum of others; (22) based on one's own mental continuum; (BB) clarifying permissible exceptions; (CC) clarifying the blameless characteristics, which has two parts: (11) clarifying the characteristics of autonomy; (22) clarifying the blameless meaning, which has three parts: (aaa) based on having no karmic fruit; (bbb) based on having no \[…\]; (ccc) based on having no harm, clarifying blamelessness; (cc) conclusion; \<2\> clarifying the characteristics of giving inanimate things, which has five parts: (aa) general question; (bb) brief answer; (cc) enumeration of terms; (dd) separate explanations, which has three parts: (AA) clarifying the substance of material wealth, which has three parts: (11) presentation; (22) explanation, which has eighteen parts, as in the treatise; (33) conclusion; (BB) clarifying the substance of grain, which has three parts: (11) question; (22) answer, which has thirteen parts, as in the treatise; (33) conclusion; (CC) clarifying the substance of dwellings/lands, which has three parts: (11) question; (22) answer, which has six parts, as in the treatise; (33) conclusion; (ee) fifth, general conclusion on the two kinds of giving, animate and inanimate; (iv) the fourth clarifies the intrinsic nature of giving, which has three parts: \[A\] presentation; \[B\] explanatory answer, which has two parts: \<1\> establishing the cause; \<2\> showing the fruit; \[C\] conclusion; (v) the fifth clarifies the skillful means of giving, which has two parts: \[A\] question; \[B\] answer, which has fifteen parts: \<1\> based on pure faith; \<2\> based on the true teaching; \<3\> based on seeing the fruit; \<4\> based on earnestness; \<5\> based on respect; \<6\> based on being free from pride; \<7\> based on necessity; \<8\> based on impartiality; \<9\> based on cleanliness; \<10\> based on exquisite quality; \<11\> based on pure items; \<12\> based on not harming oneself or others; \<13\> based on subduing stinginess; \<14\> based on joy; \<15\> based on having no regret, clarifying the skillful means of giving; (vi) the sixth clarifies for what purpose one gives, which has three parts: \[A\] presentation; \[B\] explanation, which has four parts: \<1\> based on the field of compassion; \<2\> based on the field of gratitude; \<3\> based on the field of affection; \<4\> based on the field of virtue, clarifying the intention of giving; \[C\] conclusion; (vii) the seventh clarifies the blameless nature of giving, which has three parts: \[A\] establishing the cause; \[B\] showing the fruit, which has four parts, as in the treatise; \[C\] conclusion; (3) clarifying the general conclusion. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.64](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.64) - [Next: 2.66](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.66) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801~en-mt.2.65) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.65](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.65) · Pramāṇa