[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論分門記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801) › 2.6 # 瑜伽師地論分門記 2.6 瑜伽師地論分門記 2.6 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.6) 四中第四明住種姓人數分五　一總問　二答列分二十三如論　三別釋分二十三　一明唯住種姓未趣入出離人分三。一問。二答分二。一明立正因。二顯緣因分七。一依善知識。二依聞正法。三依正信。四依持戒。五依多聞。六依惠捨。七依正見明未趣入出離。三結　二明住種姓及趣入未出離人分二。一問。二答分二。一明正義。二明差別分二。一標。二釋　三明住種姓趣入出離人分二。一問。二答　四明煗根人分三。一問。二答分二。一標。二釋分二　一立因分三如論。二顯果分五如論。三結　五明中根人分三。一問。二答分二。一標。二釋。三結　六明利根人分三。一問二答分二。一標。二釋分二。一立因分三如論。二顯果分五如論。三結　七明貪行人分三。一問。二答分二。一依猛利。二依長時明貪行人。三結　八明瞋行人分三。一問。二答分二。一依猛利。二依長時明瞋行人　三結　九明癡行人分三。一問。二答分二。一依猛利。二依長時明癡行人。三結　十明無暇人分三如上　十一明有縱逸人分三如前　十二明邪行人分三如前　十三明有障人分三如前　十四明有暇人分三如前　十五明無縱逸人分三如前　十六明無邪行人分三如前　十七明無障人分三如前　十八明遠人分三。一問。二答分二。一略答。二別釋分二。一依時明遠分二。一問。二答分三。一依利根。二依中根。三依鈍根明遠人。二依加行明遠人分二。一問。二答分二。一明義。二答差別。三總結　十九明近人分二。一問。二答分二。一略答。二別釋分二。一依時明近分三。一問。二答分二。一依後生。二依後邊定明近人。三結。二依加行明近分三。一問。二答。三總結　二十明未成熟人分三。一問。二答分二。一立因。二顯果分二。一依無學。二依見道明未熟人。三結　二十一明成熟人分三。一問。二答分二。一立因。二顯果分二。一依無學。二依見道明已熟人。三結　二十二明未清淨人分三。一問。二答分二。一立因。二顯果。三結　二十三明已清淨人分二。一問。二答。第四明總結　第五明轉正法輪及制學處意趣分二。一標。二釋分三。一依趣入。二依成熟。三依果明意趣。 > The fourth \[section\] of the four, explaining the classifications of persons who abide in gotra, has five \[parts\]: > 1. General question. > 2. List in the answer, divided into twenty-three \[parts\] as in the treatise. > 3. Specific explanations, divided into twenty-three \[parts\]: > 1. Explaining persons who only abide in gotra and have not entered \[the practice for\] renunciation, which has three \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Establishing the primary cause; 2. Showing the contributory causes, which has seven \[parts\]: 1. In terms of good spiritual friends; 2. In terms of hearing the correct Dharma; 3. In terms of correct faith; 4. In terms of maintaining morality; 5. In terms of wide learning; 6. In terms of generosity; 7. Explaining not having entered into renunciation in terms of correct view; 3. Conclusion. > 2. Explaining persons who abide in gotra and have entered \[the practice\], but have not renounced, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Explaining the correct meaning; 2. Explaining the distinctions, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Presentation; 2. Explanation. > 3. Explaining persons who abide in gotra, have entered \[the practice\], and have renounced, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer. > 4. Explaining persons of dull faculties, which has three \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Presentation; 2. Explanation, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Establishing the cause, which has three \[parts\] as in the treatise; 2. Showing the result, which has five \[parts\] as in the treatise; 3. Conclusion. > 5. Explaining persons of medium faculties, which has three \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Presentation; 2. Explanation; 3. Conclusion. > 6. Explaining persons of sharp faculties, which has three \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Presentation; 2. Explanation, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Establishing the cause, which has three \[parts\] as in the treatise; 2. Showing the result, which has five \[parts\] as in the treatise; 3. Conclusion. > 7. Explaining persons inclined to greed, which has three \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. In terms of intensity; 2. Explaining persons inclined to greed in terms of long duration; 3. Conclusion. > 8. Explaining persons inclined to anger, which has three \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. In terms of intensity; 2. Explaining persons inclined to anger in terms of long duration; 3. Conclusion. > 9. Explaining persons inclined to delusion, which has three \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. In terms of intensity; 2. Explaining persons inclined to delusion in terms of long duration; 3. Conclusion. > 10. Explaining persons who lack leisure, which has three \[parts\] as above. > 11. Explaining persons who are heedless, which has three \[parts\] as before. > 12. Explaining persons who practice wrongly, which has three \[parts\] as before. > 13. Explaining persons who have hindrances, which has three \[parts\] as before. > 14. Explaining persons who have leisure, which has three \[parts\] as before. > 15. Explaining persons who are not heedless, which has three \[parts\] as before. > 16. Explaining persons who do not practice wrongly, which has three \[parts\] as before. > 17. Explaining persons who are free from hindrances, which has three \[parts\] as before. > 18. Explaining distant persons, which has three \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Brief answer; 2. Specific explanation, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Explaining distance in terms of time, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has three \[parts\]: 1. In terms of sharp faculties; 2. In terms of medium faculties; 3. Explaining distant persons in terms of dull faculties; 2. Explaining distant persons in terms of application, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Explaining the meaning; 2. Answering the distinctions; 3. General conclusion. > 19. Explaining near persons, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Brief answer; 2. Specific explanation, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Explaining proximity in terms of time, which has three \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. In terms of future rebirth; 2. Explaining near persons in terms of ultimate meditation; 3. Conclusion; 2. Explaining proximity in terms of application, which has three \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer; 3. General conclusion. > 20. Explaining immature persons, which has three \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Establishing the cause; 2. Showing the result, which has two \[parts\]: 1. In terms of the stage of non-learning (aśaikṣa); 2. Explaining immature persons in terms of the path of seeing; 3. Conclusion. > 21. Explaining mature persons, which has three \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Establishing the cause; 2. Showing the result, which has two \[parts\]: 1. In terms of the stage of non-learning; 2. Explaining mature persons in terms of the path of seeing; 3. Conclusion. > 22. Explaining impure persons, which has three \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Establishing the cause; 2. Showing the result; 3. Conclusion. > 23. Explaining purified persons, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Question; 2. Answer. > 4. General conclusion. > 5. Explaining the intention behind turning the wheel of the correct Dharma and establishing the training precepts, which has two \[parts\]: 1. Presentation; 2. Explanation, which has three \[parts\]: 1. In terms of entering; 2. In terms of maturing; 3. Explaining the intention in terms of the result. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.5) - [Next: 2.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.7) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801~en-mt.2.6) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2801.2.6) · Pramāṇa