[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘百法明門論開宗義決](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812) › 1.106 # 大乘百法明門論開宗義決 1.106 大乘百法明門論開宗義決 1.106 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.106](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.106) 若心心所無能緣相乃至亦是能緣等者。此立見分亦有二量。第一量云。心心所法應不能緣。宗也。無能緣相故。因也。如虛空等。喻也。第二量云。或虛空等亦是能緣。宗也無能緣相故。因也。如心心所。喻也。虛空等者。等取真如及色法等。覆合並例准而作之。 > Regarding "If mind and mental factors had no subjective aspect, up to, would also be a cognizer": this establishes the subjective aspect (darśana-bhāga) also through two syllogisms. The first syllogism states: Thesis: Minds and mental factors would not be able to cognize. Reason: Because they lack a subjective aspect. Example: Like space and so forth. The second syllogism states: Thesis: Or else space and so forth would also be cognizers. Reason: Because they lack a subjective aspect. Example: Like mind and mental factors. By "space and so forth", tathatā, material dharmas, and so forth are included. The contrapositives and extensions are to be constructed analogously. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.105](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.105) - [Next: 1.107](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.107) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812~en-mt.1.106) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.106](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.106) · Pramāṇa