[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘百法明門論開宗義決](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812) › 1.119 # 大乘百法明門論開宗義決 1.119 大乘百法明門論開宗義決 1.119 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.119](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.119) 雖前三緣亦是增上等者。此通伏難。謂有難言。若是有法有勝勢用名增上緣。前言三緣亦有此義。何故不得名增上緣。為通此難故作是言。雖前三緣亦是增上。若總名為增上緣者。是則四緣更無差別。為顯四緣有差別故。除前三緣所不攝者皆入此攝名增上緣。 > Regarding "Although the previous three conditions are also sovereign": this resolves a latent objection. An opponent objects: "If being an existing dharma that has superior power and function is called an adhipati-pratyaya, the previous three conditions also have this meaning; why can they not be called adhipati-pratyaya?" To resolve this objection, it is stated: although the previous three conditions are also sovereign, if all were generally called adhipati-pratyaya, then the four conditions would have no distinction. To demonstrate that the four conditions have distinctions, everything not subsumed under the previous three conditions is included under this and called adhipati-pratyaya. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.118](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.118) - [Next: 1.120](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.120) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812~en-mt.1.119) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.119](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.119) · Pramāṇa