<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.34 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘百法明門論開宗義決](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812) › 1.34

# 大乘百法明門論開宗義決 1.34

大乘百法明門論開宗義決 1.34

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.34)

去來蘊等皆是無者。彼宗所說去來非實。與現在法有差別故。若言三世法體皆實。不應作用唯在現在。不爾作用與體應異。若與體異不應名用。如色異聲色非聲用故。現法實去來無體。

> Regarding "the aggregates and so forth of the past and future are all non-existent": What that school asserts is that the past and future are not real, because they are distinct from present dharmas. If one were to say that the substances of dharmas across the three times are all real, their function should not exist only in the present. If that were not so, the function and the substance would have to be different. If different from the substance, it should not be called its function, just as form is different from sound and form is not the function of sound; therefore, present dharmas are real, while the past and future are devoid of substance.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.33)
- [Next: 1.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.35)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812~en-mt.1.34) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.34) · Pramāṇa
