<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.36 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘百法明門論開宗義決](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812) › 1.36

# 大乘百法明門論開宗義決 1.36

大乘百法明門論開宗義決 1.36

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.36)

世出世法皆非實等者。問。此與大乘義有何別答。由執諸法定是假立。不同大乘假實雙泯。但說諸法皆假非實。不說諸法非實之因。不同應理一切諸法皆從心生。又殊勝義空。由勝義故諸法非有。故與大乘有差別也。

> Regarding "both worldly and transworldly dharmas are non-real," etc.: Question: What difference is there between this and the Mahāyāna doctrine? Answer: Because they cling to all dharmas as definitely being conventionally posited. It is unlike Mahāyāna, wherein both nominal and real are extinguished; they merely say that all dharmas are conventional and not real, without stating the cause of dharmas being non-real. It is unlike the correct principle that all dharmas are produced from mind. Moreover, it differs from the emptiness of ultimate truth, \[in which\] dharmas do not exist by virtue of the ultimate truth. Therefore, there is a difference from Mahāyāna.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.35)
- [Next: 1.37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.37)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812~en-mt.1.36) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.36) · Pramāṇa
