<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2814.4.46 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘起信論廣釋卷第三．四．五](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2814) › 4.46

# 大乘起信論廣釋卷第三．四．五 4.46

大乘起信論廣釋卷第三．四．五 4.46

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [4.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2814.4.46)

論。又諸佛法至得成辨　釋曰。次下約緣顯其差別。於中有三。謂法喻合。此初也。然信證等所有佛法若獨內因可如責。然今外假用熏為緣內熏為因方得成辨。故信證等非一時也。由是上開二種熏習。

> \[Treatise:\] "Furthermore, all Buddha-dharmas \[...\] can be accomplished." \[Commentary:\] Next, revealing their differences in terms of conditions. In this there are three parts: the teaching, the analogy, and the application. This is the first part. All Buddha-dharmas, such as faith and realization, if dependent solely on internal causes, might be subject to the objection; however, now relying externally on the perfuming of activity as a condition and internally on perfuming as a cause, they can only then be accomplished. Therefore, faith, realization, and so forth are not simultaneous. Because of this, the two kinds of perfuming were distinguished above.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 4.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2814.4.45)
- [Next: 4.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2814.4.47)
- [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2814.4)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2814~en-mt.4.46) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [大乘起信論略述](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2813.2.24) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2814.4.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2814.4.46) · Pramāṇa
