Kathavatthu 15.2.2
Kathāvatthu 15.2.2
- Language
- Pāli
15.2.2.1
Taṇhāpaccayāva upādānaṃ, na vattabbaṃ—
Again, “grasping is conditioned by craving”. Now, is it wrong to say that craving is conditioned by grasping? Yes, you say. But the argument above is valid here also.
15.2.2.2
“upādānapaccayāpi taṇhā”ti?
Again, “grasping is conditioned by craving”. Now, is it wrong to say that craving is conditioned by grasping? Yes, you say. But the argument above is valid here also.
15.2.2.3
Āmantā.
Again, “grasping is conditioned by craving”. Now, is it wrong to say that craving is conditioned by grasping? Yes, you say. But the argument above is valid here also.
15.2.2.4
Nanu taṇhā upādānena sahajātāti?
Again, “grasping is conditioned by craving”. Now, is it wrong to say that craving is conditioned by grasping? Yes, you say. But the argument above is valid here also.
15.2.2.5
Āmantā.
Again, “grasping is conditioned by craving”. Now, is it wrong to say that craving is conditioned by grasping? Yes, you say. But the argument above is valid here also.
15.2.2.6
Hañci taṇhā upādānena sahajātā, tena vata re vattabbe—
Again, “grasping is conditioned by craving”. Now, is it wrong to say that craving is conditioned by grasping? Yes, you say. But the argument above is valid here also.
15.2.2.7
“taṇhāpaccayāpi upādānaṃ, upādānapaccayāpi taṇhā”ti.
Again, “grasping is conditioned by craving”. Now, is it wrong to say that craving is conditioned by grasping? Yes, you say. But the argument above is valid here also.
Translations (2)
- Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse — Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, English
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation
Commentaries (2)
- Mūlaṭīkā — Ānanda (Vanaratana), Pāli
- Pañcappakaraṇaṭṭhakathā — Buddhaghosa, Pāli