Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

Kathavatthu 5.5.2

Kathāvatthu 5.5.2

Language
Pāli

5.5.2.1

Sabbaṃ ñāṇaṃ paṭisambhidāti?

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.2

Āmantā.

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.3

Sabbā paññā paṭisambhidāti?

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.4

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.5

sabbā paññā paṭisambhidāti?

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.6

Āmantā.

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.7

Pathavīkasiṇaṃ samāpattiṃ samāpannassa atthi paññā, sā paññā paṭisambhidāti?

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.8

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.9

āpokasiṇaṃ …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.10

tejokasiṇaṃ …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.11

vāyokasiṇaṃ …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.12

nīlakasiṇaṃ …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.13

pītakasiṇaṃ …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.14

lohitakasiṇaṃ …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.15

odātakasiṇaṃ …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.16

ākāsānañcāyatanaṃ …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.17

viññāṇañcāyatanaṃ …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.18

ākiñcaññāyatanaṃ …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.19

nevasaññānāsaññāyatanaṃ samāpannassa …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.20

dānaṃ dadantassa …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.21

cīvaraṃ dadantassa …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.22

piṇḍapātaṃ dadantassa …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.23

senāsanaṃ dadantassa …pe…

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.24

gilānapaccayabhesajjaparikkhāraṃ dadantassa atthi paññā, sā paññā paṭisambhidāti?

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

5.5.2.25

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe….

Again, if all knowledge is analytic, then a fortiori all discernment is analytic. Or, if you can assent to that, you must therewith admit that the discernment of one who attains Jhāna by any of the elemental, or colour “artifices”, who attains any of the four more abstract Jhānas, who gives donations, who gives to the Order any of the four necessaries of life, is analytic. But this you deny.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

Translations (2)

Commentaries (2)