Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

Kathavatthu 7.4.2

Kathāvatthu 7.4.2

Language
Pāli

7.4.2.1

Na vattabbaṃ—

Rājagirika, Siddhatthika: If we are wrong, we ask you, is giving attended by undesirable, disagreeable, unpleasant, barren consequences? Does it induce, and result in, sorrow? Is not rather the opposite true? Surely then dāna is a mental state.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.4.2.2

“cetasiko dhammo dānan”ti?

Rājagirika, Siddhatthika: If we are wrong, we ask you, is giving attended by undesirable, disagreeable, unpleasant, barren consequences? Does it induce, and result in, sorrow? Is not rather the opposite true? Surely then dāna is a mental state.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.4.2.3

Āmantā.

Rājagirika, Siddhatthika: If we are wrong, we ask you, is giving attended by undesirable, disagreeable, unpleasant, barren consequences? Does it induce, and result in, sorrow? Is not rather the opposite true? Surely then dāna is a mental state.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.4.2.4

Dānaṃ aniṭṭhaphalaṃ akantaphalaṃ amanuññaphalaṃ secanakaphalaṃ dukkhudrayaṃ dukkhavipākanti?

Rājagirika, Siddhatthika: If we are wrong, we ask you, is giving attended by undesirable, disagreeable, unpleasant, barren consequences? Does it induce, and result in, sorrow? Is not rather the opposite true? Surely then dāna is a mental state.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.4.2.5

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…

Rājagirika, Siddhatthika: If we are wrong, we ask you, is giving attended by undesirable, disagreeable, unpleasant, barren consequences? Does it induce, and result in, sorrow? Is not rather the opposite true? Surely then dāna is a mental state.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.4.2.6

nanu dānaṃ iṭṭhaphalaṃ kantaphalaṃ manuññaphalaṃ asecanakaphalaṃ sukhudrayaṃ sukhavipākanti?

Rājagirika, Siddhatthika: If we are wrong, we ask you, is giving attended by undesirable, disagreeable, unpleasant, barren consequences? Does it induce, and result in, sorrow? Is not rather the opposite true? Surely then dāna is a mental state.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.4.2.7

Āmantā.

Rājagirika, Siddhatthika: If we are wrong, we ask you, is giving attended by undesirable, disagreeable, unpleasant, barren consequences? Does it induce, and result in, sorrow? Is not rather the opposite true? Surely then dāna is a mental state.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.4.2.8

Hañci dānaṃ iṭṭhaphalaṃ kantaphalaṃ manuññaphalaṃ asecanakaphalaṃ sukhudrayaṃ sukhavipākaṃ, tena vata re vattabbe—

Rājagirika, Siddhatthika: If we are wrong, we ask you, is giving attended by undesirable, disagreeable, unpleasant, barren consequences? Does it induce, and result in, sorrow? Is not rather the opposite true? Surely then dāna is a mental state.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.4.2.9

“cetasiko dhammo dānan”ti.

Rājagirika, Siddhatthika: If we are wrong, we ask you, is giving attended by undesirable, disagreeable, unpleasant, barren consequences? Does it induce, and result in, sorrow? Is not rather the opposite true? Surely then dāna is a mental state.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

Translations (2)

Commentaries (2)