Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

Kathavatthu 7.6: Itodinnakathā

Kathāvatthu 7.6

Language
Pāli

Contents

Itodinnakathā

7.6.1.1

Ito dinnena tattha yāpentīti?

[Opponent:] “Do they sustain themselves there by what is given from here?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Controverted Point: That what is given here sustains elsewhere.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.1.2

Āmantā.

[Theravādin:] “Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Controverted Point: That what is given here sustains elsewhere.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.1.3

Ito cīvaraṃ denti taṃ cīvaraṃ tattha paribhuñjantīti?

[Opponent:] “If they give a robe from here, do they enjoy that robe there?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: Your proposition commits you to the further statement that robes, alms-food, lodging, medical requisites for ailments, hard food, soft food, and drink, given in this life, are enjoyed in the after-life—which you deny … And it commits you further to this heterodox position, that one person is the agent for another; that the happiness or ill we feel is wrought by others; that one acts, another experiences the consequences—which you deny … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.1.4

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…

[Theravādin:] “It should not be said thus …pe…”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.1.5

ito piṇḍapātaṃ denti, ito senāsanaṃ denti, ito gilānapaccayabhesajjaparikkhāraṃ denti, ito khādanīyaṃ denti, ito bhojanīyaṃ denti, ito pānīyaṃ denti;

[Opponent:] “If they give almsfood from here, if they give lodgings from here, if they give requisites of medicines for the sick from here, if they give solid food from here, if they give soft food from here, if they give drink from here;

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.1.6

taṃ pānīyaṃ tattha paribhuñjantīti?

do they enjoy that drink there?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.1.7

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe….

[Theravādin:] “It should not be said thus …pe…”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.2.1

Ito dinnena tattha yāpentīti?

[Opponent:] “Do they sustain themselves there by what is given from here?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.2.2

Āmantā.

[Theravādin:] “Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.2.3

Añño aññassa kārako parakataṃ sukhadukkhaṃ añño karoti, añño paṭisaṃvedetīti?

[Opponent:] “Is one the agent for another; is pleasure and pain made by another; does one do it and another experience it?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.2.4

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe….

[Theravādin:] “It should not be said thus …pe…”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.3.1

Na vattabbaṃ—

[Opponent:] “Should it not be said:

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Rājagirika, Siddhatthika: You deny our proposition. But do not the Petas thank him who gives a gift for their advantage, are not their hearts appeased, are they not interested, do they not obtain gladness? Was it not said by the Exalted One:

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.3.2

“ito dinnena tattha yāpentī”ti?

‘They sustain themselves there by what is given from here’?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.3.3

Āmantā.

[Theravādin:] “Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.3.4

Nanu petā attano atthāya dānaṃ dentaṃ anumodenti, cittaṃ pasādenti, pītiṃ uppādenti, somanassaṃ paṭilabhantīti?

[Opponent:] “Do not the departed rejoice in one giving a gift for their benefit, purify their minds, give rise to joy, and obtain gladness?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.3.5

Āmantā.

[Theravādin:] “Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.3.6

Hañci petā attano atthāya dānaṃ dentaṃ anumodenti, cittaṃ pasādenti, pītiṃ uppādenti, somanassaṃ paṭilabhanti;

[Opponent:] “If the departed rejoice in one giving a gift for their benefit, purify their minds, give rise to joy, and obtain gladness;

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.3.7

tena vata re vattabbe—

then indeed you should say:

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.3.8

“ito dinnena tattha yāpentī”ti.

‘They sustain themselves there by what is given from here.’”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.4.1

Na vattabbaṃ—

[Opponent:] “Should it not be said:

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.4.2

“ito dinnena tattha yāpentī”ti?

‘They sustain themselves there by what is given from here’?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.4.3

Āmantā.

[Theravādin:] “Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.4.4

Nanu vuttaṃ bhagavatā—

[Opponent:] “Was it not said by the Blessed One:

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.5.1

“Unname udakaṃ vuṭṭhaṃ,

‘As rain fallen on high ground

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“As water rained upon high slope
Doth ever down the hillside run,
E'en so whate'er on earth is given
Doth reach the hapless Peta shades.
And as the brimming rivers run
To keep the mighty ocean full.
E'en so whate'er, etc.
For where they dwell no husbandry
Nor tending daily kine is there,
No merchant traffic as with us,
No goods to buy with precious coin.
By what is given here below
They share who, dead, 'mong Petas go”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.5.2

yathāninnaṃ pavattati;

flows down to the low ground,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.5.3

Evameva ito dinnaṃ,

even so what is given from here

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.5.4

petānaṃ upakappati.

benefits the departed.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.6.1

Yathā vārivahā pūrā,

Just as full rivers

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.6.2

paripūrenti sāgaraṃ;

fill up the ocean,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.6.3

Evameva ito dinnaṃ,

even so what is given from here

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.6.4

petānaṃ upakappati.

benefits the departed.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.7.1

Na hi tattha kasī atthi,

For there is no farming there,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.7.2

gorakkhettha na vijjati;

Nor is cattle-farming found there;
2

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.7.3

Vaṇijjā tādisī natthi,

nor is there cattle breeding found there;

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.7.4

hiraññena kayākayaṃ;

there is no commerce of such kind

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.7.5

Ito dinnena yāpenti,

as buying and selling with gold.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.7.6

petā kālaṅkatā tahin”ti.

The departed who have died sustain themselves there

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.8.1

Attheva suttantoti?

by what is given from here’?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Therefore our proposition is right.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.8.2

Āmantā.

“Is there such a Suttanta?”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Therefore our proposition is right.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.8.3

Tena hi ito dinnena tattha yāpentīti.

[Theravādin:] “Yes.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Therefore our proposition is right.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.9.1

Na vattabbaṃ—

[Opponent:] “Therefore they sustain themselves there by what is given from here.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Again, was it not said by the Exalted One:

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.9.2

“ito dinnena tattha yāpentī”ti?

[Theravādin:] “Should it not be said:

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Again, was it not said by the Exalted One:

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.9.3

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Again, was it not said by the Exalted One:

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.9.4

Nanu vuttaṃ bhagavatā—

Was it not said by the Blessed One:

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Again, was it not said by the Exalted One:

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.9.5

“pañcimāni, bhikkhave, ṭhānāni sampassantā mātāpitaro puttaṃ icchanti kule jāyamānaṃ.

“Monks, seeing these five reasons, parents desire a son born in the family.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Bhikkhus, there are these five matters which parents, if wishing for a child to be born to them, contemplate. Which are the five? Cared for (they think) he will care for us; or, he will do our work; he will continue our family; he will inherit our property; he will institute offerings to the departed parent shades (Petas).

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.9.6

Katamāni pañca?

Which five?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Bhikkhus, there are these five matters which parents, if wishing for a child to be born to them, contemplate. Which are the five? Cared for (they think) he will care for us; or, he will do our work; he will continue our family; he will inherit our property; he will institute offerings to the departed parent shades (Petas).

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.9.7

Bhaṭo vā no bharissati, kiccaṃ vā no karissati, kulavaṃso ciraṃ ṭhassati, dāyajjaṃ paṭipajjissati, atha vā pana petānaṃ kālaṅkatānaṃ dakkhiṇaṃ anuppadassati—

‘Supported by us, he will support us; or he will do duties for us; the family lineage will long endure; he will manage the inheritance; or else he will offer a dedication to departed ancestors’—

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Bhikkhus, there are these five matters which parents, if wishing for a child to be born to them, contemplate. Which are the five? Cared for (they think) he will care for us; or, he will do our work; he will continue our family; he will inherit our property; he will institute offerings to the departed parent shades (Petas).

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.9.8

imāni kho, bhikkhave, pañca ṭhānāni sampassantā mātāpitaro puttaṃ icchanti kule jāyamānanti.

these, monks, are the five reasons, seeing which parents desire a son born in the family.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Bhikkhus, there are these five matters which parents, if wishing for a child to be born to them, contemplate. Which are the five? Cared for (they think) he will care for us; or, he will do our work; he will continue our family; he will inherit our property; he will institute offerings to the departed parent shades (Petas).

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.10.1

Pañca ṭhānāni sampassaṃ,

Seeing five reasons,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Wise folk who fain a child would have
Have five advantages in view:
Us by his wages he will keep;
His will it be our work to do;

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.10.2

puttaṃ icchanti paṇḍitā;

the wise desire a son:

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Wise folk who fain a child would have
Have five advantages in view:
Us by his wages he will keep;
His will it be our work to do;

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.10.3

Bhaṭo vā no bharissati,

‘Supported by us, he will support us,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Wise folk who fain a child would have
Have five advantages in view:
Us by his wages he will keep;
His will it be our work to do;

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.10.4

kiccaṃ vā no karissati.

or he will do duties for us.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Wise folk who fain a child would have
Have five advantages in view:
Us by his wages he will keep;
His will it be our work to do;

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.11.1

Kulavaṃso ciraṃ tiṭṭhe,

May the family lineage long endure,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Our family will long endure;
Our heritage to him we leave;
And then again an offering
To Peta-shades he'll institute.
These matters five keep well in view
The wise who fain a child would have.
Wherefore the pious and the good,
Children who know and grateful feel,
Support their mother and their sire,
Remembering all these did for them.
Their tasks they take upon themselves,
E'en as their parents toiled for them;
Do their behests and them maintain,
Nor suffer that their race decay.
Praise to the child of filial heart,
With piety and virtue dight”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.11.2

dāyajjaṃ paṭipajjati;

he will manage the inheritance;

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.11.3

Atha vā pana petānaṃ,

Or else, to the departed,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.11.4

dakkhiṇaṃ anuppadassati.

he will offer a dedication.’

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.12.1

Ṭhānānetāni sampassaṃ,

Seeing these reasons,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.12.2

puttaṃ icchanti paṇḍitā;

the wise desire a son;

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.12.3

Tasmā santo sappurisā,

Therefore good and true people,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.12.4

kataññū katavedino.

grateful and reciprocal,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.13.1

Bharanti mātāpitaro,

Support mother and father,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.13.2

pubbe katamanussaraṃ;

remembering what was done before;

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.13.3

Karonti tesaṃ kiccāni,

They do their duties,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.13.4

yathā taṃ pubbakārinaṃ.

as for those who acted first.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.14.1

Ovādakārī bhaṭaposī,

Obedient to instruction, supporting those who supported him,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.14.2

kulavaṃsaṃ ahāpayaṃ;

not letting the family lineage fail;

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.14.3

Saddho sīlena sampanno,

Endowed with faith and virtue,

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.14.4

putto hoti pasaṃsiyo”ti.

such a son is praiseworthy.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

7.6.15.1

Attheva suttantoti?

Is there such a discourse?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Was it not so said? Then is our proposition right.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.15.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Was it not so said? Then is our proposition right.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.15.3

Tena hi ito dinnena tattha yāpentīti.

Therefore, they subsist there by what is given from here.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Was it not so said? Then is our proposition right.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

7.6.15.4

Ito dinnakathā niṭṭhitā.

Discussion on what is given from here is finished.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (2)

Commentaries (2)

Linked texts (2)

Discussed in (3)