Kathavatthu 9.2.1
Kathāvatthu 9.2.1
- Language
- Pāli
9.2.1.1
Amatārammaṇaṃ saṃyojananti?
Controverted Point: That the Ambrosial as an object of thought is a “fetter”.
9.2.1.2
Āmantā.
Controverted Point: That the Ambrosial as an object of thought is a “fetter”.
9.2.1.3
Amataṃ saṃyojaniyaṃ ganthaniyaṃ oghaniyaṃ yoganiyaṃ nīvaraṇiyaṃ parāmaṭṭhaṃ upādāniyaṃ saṅkilesiyanti?
Theravādin: If you say that, are you prepared to admit that the Ambrosial is the object of consciousness accompanied by “Fetters”, “Ties”, “Floods”, “Bonds”, “Hindrances”, “Infections”, “Graspings”, “Corruptions”? Is it not rather an object accompanied by the very opposite?
9.2.1.4
Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…
Theravādin: If you say that, are you prepared to admit that the Ambrosial is the object of consciousness accompanied by “Fetters”, “Ties”, “Floods”, “Bonds”, “Hindrances”, “Infections”, “Graspings”, “Corruptions”? Is it not rather an object accompanied by the very opposite?
9.2.1.5
nanu amataṃ asaṃyojaniyaṃ aganthaniyaṃ …pe… asaṅkilesiyanti?
Theravādin: If you say that, are you prepared to admit that the Ambrosial is the object of consciousness accompanied by “Fetters”, “Ties”, “Floods”, “Bonds”, “Hindrances”, “Infections”, “Graspings”, “Corruptions”? Is it not rather an object accompanied by the very opposite?
9.2.1.6
Āmantā.
Theravādin: If you say that, are you prepared to admit that the Ambrosial is the object of consciousness accompanied by “Fetters”, “Ties”, “Floods”, “Bonds”, “Hindrances”, “Infections”, “Graspings”, “Corruptions”? Is it not rather an object accompanied by the very opposite?
9.2.1.7
Hañci amataṃ asaṃyojaniyaṃ …pe… asaṅkilesiyaṃ, no ca vata re vattabbe—
Theravādin: If you say that, are you prepared to admit that the Ambrosial is the object of consciousness accompanied by “Fetters”, “Ties”, “Floods”, “Bonds”, “Hindrances”, “Infections”, “Graspings”, “Corruptions”? Is it not rather an object accompanied by the very opposite?
9.2.1.8
“amatārammaṇaṃ saṃyojanan”ti.
Theravādin: If you say that, are you prepared to admit that the Ambrosial is the object of consciousness accompanied by “Fetters”, “Ties”, “Floods”, “Bonds”, “Hindrances”, “Infections”, “Graspings”, “Corruptions”? Is it not rather an object accompanied by the very opposite?
Translations (2)
- Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse — Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, English
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation
Commentaries (2)
- Mūlaṭīkā — Ānanda (Vanaratana), Pāli
- Pañcappakaraṇaṭṭhakathā — Buddhaghosa, Pāli