Kathavatthu 9.4.3

9.4.3.1

Kāmarāgānusayo anārammaṇoti?

Does the underlying tendency to sensual lust have no object?

Or again, in what aggregate is latent bias included? The aggregate of mental coefficients, you say. But these are concomitant with object not less than the other mental aggregates: this you of course admit. How then can you maintain your proposition? If you affirm that (a) the bias of sense-lust has the aggregate of mental coefficients involved with it, and yet is without mental object, you must say no less of (b) sense-lust in general. But you refuse (making of sense-lust as bias a thing apart).

9.4.3.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

9.4.3.3

Katamakkhandhapariyāpannoti?

Included in which aggregate?

9.4.3.4

Saṅkhārakkhandhapariyāpannoti.

Included in the aggregate of volitional formations.

9.4.3.5

Saṅkhārakkhandho anārammaṇoti?

Does the aggregate of volitional formations have no object?

9.4.3.6

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…

It should not be said thus …pe….

9.4.3.7

saṅkhārakkhandho anārammaṇoti?

Is the aggregate of volitional formations without an object?

9.4.3.8

Āmantā.

Yes.

9.4.3.9

Vedanākkhandho saññākkhandho viññāṇakkhandho anārammaṇoti?

Are the aggregate of feeling, the aggregate of perception, and the aggregate of consciousness without an object?

9.4.3.10

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe….

It should not be said thus …pe….