Kathavatthu 9.5.2

9.5.2.1

Ñāṇaṃ anārammaṇanti?

Is knowledge without an object?

Here, too, you judge that the aggregate of mental coefficients is involved. But as in the preceding discourse, so here: you cannot say, a mental aggregate is without object, or partly so. And you cannot affirm that understanding, which is involved in that aggregate, is with mental object, while insight, also involved in it, is without.

9.5.2.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

9.5.2.3

Katamakkhandhapariyāpannanti?

Included in which aggregate?

9.5.2.4

Saṅkhārakkhandhapariyāpannanti.

Included in the aggregate of volitional formations.

9.5.2.5

Saṅkhārakkhandho anārammaṇoti?

Is the aggregate of volitional formations without an object?

9.5.2.6

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…

It should not be said thus …pe…

9.5.2.7

saṅkhārakkhandho anārammaṇoti?

Is the aggregate of volitional formations without an object?

9.5.2.8

Āmantā.

Yes.

9.5.2.9

Vedanākkhandho saññākkhandho viññāṇakkhandho anārammaṇoti?

Are the aggregate of feeling, the aggregate of perception, the aggregate of consciousness without an object?

9.5.2.10

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…

It should not be said thus …pe…

9.5.2.11

ñāṇaṃ saṅkhārakkhandhapariyāpannaṃ anārammaṇanti?

Is knowledge, being included in the aggregate of volitional formations, without an object?

9.5.2.12

Āmantā.

Yes.

9.5.2.13

Paññā saṅkhārakkhandhapariyāpannā anārammaṇāti?

Is wisdom, being included in the aggregate of volitional formations, without an object?

9.5.2.14

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe…

It should not be said thus …pe…

9.5.2.15

paññā saṅkhārakkhandhapariyāpannā sārammaṇāti?

Is wisdom, being included in the aggregate of volitional formations, with an object?

9.5.2.16

Āmantā.

Yes.

9.5.2.17

Ñāṇaṃ saṅkhārakkhandhapariyāpannaṃ sārammaṇanti?

Is knowledge, being included in the aggregate of volitional formations, with an object?

9.5.2.18

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe….

It should not be said thus …pe….