[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Dark Ages](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages) › [General histories](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.general) › [Muntakhab al-tawārīkh](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.general.muntakhab-al-tawarikh) › [Muntakhabu-t-tawarikh (Ranking, Lowe, Haig)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.general.muntakhab-al-tawarikh~en-ranking-lowe-haig) › 65.4.3 # Muntakhab al-tawarikh 65.4.3 Muntakhabu-t-tawārīkh (Ranking, Lowe, Haig) 65.4.3 - **Language:** English ### [65.4.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.general.muntakhab-al-tawarikh~en-ranking-lowe-haig.65.4.3) The gist of the matter appears to be this that Tabarra is not justifiable for immorality, but only for infidelity. It seems therefore to take the place in Muslim Theology of the anathema of the Christian Code. It is more than excommunication, inasmuch as death in infidelity is made the test of tabarra which thus implies final separation and curse. - [Previous: 65.4.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.general.muntakhab-al-tawarikh~en-ranking-lowe-haig.65.4.2) - [Next: 65.4.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.general.muntakhab-al-tawarikh~en-ranking-lowe-haig.65.4.4) - [Up: 65.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.general.muntakhab-al-tawarikh~en-ranking-lowe-haig.65.4) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.general.muntakhab-al-tawarikh~en-ranking-lowe-haig.65.4.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.general.muntakhab-al-tawarikh~en-ranking-lowe-haig.65.4.3) · Pramāṇa