[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Dark Ages](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages) › [Mughals (1526–1857)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal) › [Bābur (1526–1530)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur) › [Bāburnāma](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama) › [The Babur-nama in English (A. S. Beveridge)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge) › 899.7 # The Memoirs of Bābur 899.7 The Bābur-nāma in English (A. S. Beveridge) 899.7 - **Language:** English ### [899.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge.899.7) Qulī Muḥammad \_Būghdā\_\[225\] was another, a \_qūchīn\_; he must have been a brave man. \`Abdu'l-karīm \_Ishrit\_\[226\] was another; he was an Aūīghūr, Sl. Aḥmad Mīrzā's Lord of the Gate, a brave and generous man. (\_u. Historical narrative resumed.\_) After Sl. Aḥmad Mīrzā's death, his begs in agreement, sent a courier by the mountain-road to invite Sl. Maḥmūd Mīrzā.\[227\] Malik-i-Muḥammad Mīrzā, the son of Minūchihr Mīrzā, Sl. Abū-sa\`īd Mīrzā's eldest brother, aspired for his own part to rule. Having drawn a few adventurers and desperadoes to himself, they dribbled away\[228\] from (Sl. Aḥmad Mīrzā's) camp and went to Samarkand. He was not able to effect anything, but he brought about his own death and that of several innocent persons of the ruling House. At once on hearing of his brother's death, Sl. Maḥmūd Mīrzā went off to Samarkand and there seated himself on the throne, without difficulty. Some of his doings soon disgusted and alienated high and low, soldier and peasant. The first of these was that he sent the above-named Malik-i-Muḥammad to the \[Sidenote: Fol. 23b.\] Kūk-sarāī,\[229\] although he was his father's brother's son and his own son-in-law.\[230\] With him he sent others, four Mīrzās in all. Two of these he set aside; Malik-i-Muḥammad and one other he martyred. Some of the four were not even of ruling rank and had not the smallest aspiration to rule; though Malik-i-Muḥammad Mīrzā was a little in fault, in the rest there was no blame whatever. A second thing was that though his methods and regulations were excellent, and though he was expert in revenue matters and in the art of administration, his nature inclined to tyranny and vice. Directly he reached Samarkand, he began to make new regulations and arrangements and to rate and tax on a new basis. Moreover the dependants of his (late) Highness Khwāja \`Ubaid'l-lāh, under whose protection formerly many poor and destitute persons had lived free from the burden of dues and imposts, were now themselves treated with harshness and oppression. On what ground should hardship have touched them? Nevertheless oppressive exactions were made from them, indeed from the Khwāja's very children. Yet another thing was that just as he was vicious and tyrannical, so were his begs, small and great, and his retainers and followers. The Ḥiṣārīs and in particular the followers of Khusrau Shāh engaged themselves unceasingly with wine and fornication. Once one of them enticed and took away a certain man's wife. \[Sidenote: Fol. 24.\]When her husband went to Khusrau Shāh and asked for justice, he received for answer: "She has been with you for several years; let her be a few days with him." Another thing was that the young sons of the townsmen and shopkeepers, nay! even of Turks and soldiers could not go out from their houses from fear of being taken for catamites. The Samarakandīs, having passed 20 or 25 years under Sl. Aḥmad Mīrzā in ease and tranquillity, most matters carried through lawfully and with justice by his Highness the Khwāja, were wounded and troubled in heart and soul, by this oppression and this vice. Low and high, the poor, the destitute, all opened the mouth to curse, all lifted the hand for redress. "Beware the steaming up of inward wounds, For an inward wound at the last makes head; Avoid while thou canst, distress to one heart, For a single sigh will convulse a world."\[231\] By reason of his infamous violence and vice Sl. Maḥmud Mīrzā did not rule in Samarkand more than five or six months. - [Previous: 899.6.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge.899.6.8) - [Next: 900.1.1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge.900.1.1) - [Up: 899](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge.899) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge.899.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge.899.7) · Pramāṇa