[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Dark Ages](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages) › [Mughals (1526–1857)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal) › [Bābur (1526–1530)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur) › [Bāburnāma](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama) › [The Babur-nama in English (A. S. Beveridge)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge) › 930 # The Memoirs of Bābur 930 The Bābur-nāma in English (A. S. Beveridge) 930 - **Language:** English ### [930.1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge.930.1) 930 AH.—NOV. 10TH 1523 TO OCT. 29TH 1524 AD. \_a. Bābur's fourth expedition to Hindūstān.\_ This expedition differs from all earlier ones by its co-operation with Afghān malcontents against Ibrāhīm \_Lūdī\_, and by having for its declared purpose direct attack on him through reinforcement of \`Ālam Khān. Exactly when the start from Kābul was made is not found stated; the route taken after fording the Indus, was by the sub-montane road through the Kakar country; the Jīhlam and Chīn-āb were crossed and a move was made to within 10 miles of Lāhor. Lāhor was Daulat Khān's head-quarters but he was not in it now; he had fled for refuge to a colony of Bilūchīs, perhaps towards Multān, on the approach against him of an army of Ibrāhīm's under Bihār Khān \_Lūdī\_. A battle ensued between Bābur and Bihār Khān; the latter was defeated with great slaughter; Bābur's troops followed his fugitive men into Lāhor, plundered the town and burned some of the \_bāzārs\_. Four days were spent near Lāhor, then move south was made to Dībālpūr which was stormed, plundered and put to the sword. The date of this capture is known from an incidental remark of Bābur about chronograms (f. 325), to be mid-Rabī\`u'l-awwal 930 AH. (\_circa\_ Jan. 22nd 1524 AD.).\[1562\] From Dībālpūr a start was made for Sihrind but before this could be reached news arrived which dictated return to Lāhor. \_b. The cause of return.\_ ### [930.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge.930.2) Daulat Khān's action is the obvious cause of the retirement. He and his sons had not joined Bābur until the latter was at Dībālpūr; he was not restored to his former place in charge of the important Lāhor, but was given Jalandhar and Sulṯānpūr, a town of his own foundation. This angered him extremely but he seems to have concealed his feelings for the time and to have given Bābur counsel as if he were content. His son Dilāwar, however, represented to Bābur that his father's advice was treacherous; it concerned a move to Multān, from which place Daulat Khān may have come up to Dībālpūr and connected with which at this time, something is recorded of co-operation by Bābur and Shāh Ḥasan \_Arghūn\_. But the incident is not yet found clearly described by a source. Dilāwar Khān told Bābur that his father's object was to divide and thus weaken the invading force, and as this would have been the result of taking Daulat Khān's advice, Bābur arrested him and Apāq on suspicion of treacherous intent. They were soon released, and Sulṯānpūr was given them, but they fled to the hills, there to await a chance to swoop on the Panj-āb. Daulat Khān's hostility and his non-fulfilment of his engagement with Bābur placing danger in the rear of an eastward advance, the Panj-āb was garrisoned by Bābur's own followers and he himself went back to Kābul. ### [930.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge.930.3) It is evident from what followed that Daulat Khān commanded much strength in the Panj-āb; evident also that something counselled delay in the attack on Ibrāhīm, perhaps closer cohesion in favour of \`Ālam Khān, certainly removal of the menace of Daulat Khān in the rear; there may have been news already of the approach of the Aūzbegs on Balkh which took Bābur next year across Hindū-kush. \_c. The Panj-āb garrison.\_ The expedition had extended Bābur's command considerably, notably by obtaining possession of Lāhor. He now posted in it Mīr \`Abdu'l-\`azīz his Master of the Horse; in Dībālpūr he posted, with \`Ālam Khān, Bābā Qashqa \_Mughūl\_; in Sīālkot, Khusrau Kūkūldāsh, in Kalanūr, Muḥammad \`Alī \_Tājik\_. \_d. Two deaths.\_ This year, on Rajab 19th (May 23rd) died Ismā\`īl \_Ṣafawī\_ at the age of 38, broken by defeat from Sulṯān Salīm of Rūm.\[1563\] He was succeeded by his son T̤ahmāsp, a child of ten. ### [930.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge.930.4) This year may be that of the death of Shāh Shujā\` \_Arghūn\_,\[1564\] on Sha\`bān 22nd (July 18th), the last grief of his burden being the death of his foster-brother Fāẓil concerning which, as well as Shāh Beg's own death, Mīr Ma\`ṣūm's account is worthy of full reproduction. Shāh Beg was succeeded in Sind by his son Ḥasan, who read the \_khuṯba\_ for Bābur and drew closer links with Bābur's circle by marrying, either this year or the next, Khalīfa's daughter Gul-barg, with whom betrothal had been made during Ḥasan's visit to Bābur in Kābul. Moreover Khalīfa's son Muḥibb-i-\`alī married Nāhīd the daughter of Qāsim Kūkūldāsh and Māh-chūchūk \_Arghūn\_ (f. 214\_b\_). These alliances were made, says Ma\`ṣūm, to strengthen Ḥasan's position at Bābur's Court. \_e. A garden detail.\_ In this year and presumably on his return from the Panj-āb, Bābur, as he himself chronicles (f. 132), had plantains (bananas) brought from Hindūstān for the Bāgh-i-wafā at Adīnapūr. --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge.930](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.mughal.babur.baburnama~en-beveridge.930) · Pramāṇa