<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty.170.4.9 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Dark Ages](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages) › [Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate) › [Ṭabaqāt-i Nāṣirī](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri) › [Tabakat-i-Nasiri](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty) › 170.4.9

# The Nāṣirī Generations 170.4.9

Tabakat-i-Nasiri 170.4.9

- **Language:** English

### [170.4.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty.170.4.9)

and the Khokhars, who also used to pay tribute to the Sultan, in consequence of these reports, also rose.” Taj-ul-Ma’asir, after stating that the proceedings of Lik-Tal, and the rumoured death of the Sultan, was the cause of great confusion and disturbance, says, “ the Kokar tribe, rising in rebellion, entertained the idea of becoming independent, and obtaining dominion. The sons of Kokar, Bakan and Sarkak \[Firishtah has but one, whom he calls ' the chief of the Khokhars, who bore the name of Sarkah'\], also entertained the desire of acquiring sovereign power.” Then there is an account of their taking Lohor, and of their defeating the feudatories of the Multan province, Baha-ud-Din and his brother, and others, and that the Sipah-Salar, Suliman, had to fly before them.\] Alfi continues:— “When Shihab-ud-Din reached Ghaznah in safety, in the manner previously described, and this matter came to his knowledge, he determined to proceed into Hindustan, and thoroughly chastise the rebels of that part. Therefore he first directed Amir Muhammad, son of Abi ’Ali \[this must be his kinsman, the son-in-law of Ghiyas-ud-Din, the late Sultan\], who was his lieutenant over Luhawar and Multan \[the Amir-i-Dad, Hasan, was probably subordinate to him\], to remit with all possible celerity the revenue of the year 601 H. \[and yet the Taj-ul-Ma’asir gives the year 600 H.

- [Previous: 170.4.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty.170.4.8)
- [Next: 170.4.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty.170.4.10)
- [Up: 170.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty.170.4)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty.170.4.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty.170.4.9) · Pramāṇa
