[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Dark Ages](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages) › [Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate) › [Ṭabaqāt-i Nāṣirī](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri) › [Tabakat-i-Nasiri](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty) › 248.2.1 # The Nāṣirī Generations 248.2.1 Tabakat-i-Nasiri 248.2.1 - **Language:** English ### [248.2.1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty.248.2.1) The rest agrees with what has been already stated, and Kar-kir or Kar-kiz is evidently a mistake for Khar-khez—also written Khar-kher—of the I-ghurs, which is generally used in conjunction with Tungut in the history of the Chingiz Khan. Abu-l-Ghazi however mentions, with regard to those who escaped the massacre, that they were taken captive by the Tattars, but, subsequently, escaped from the solitary guard placed over them. The Khan of Kar-kir or Kar-kiz, in this account, would seem to be meant for Tur of the I-rani authors. Abu-l-Ghazi however constantly falls into error, for, after having given this account of the destruction of the Mughals by the Tattars, he, in another place, makes "the tribe of Tattars" an entirely new subject, as though another, and distinct tribe. See also the translation of that work "History of the Turks, Moguls, and Tatars," page 38, vol. i. London, MDCCXXX. - [Previous: 248.1.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty.248.1.8) - [Next: 248.2.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty.248.2.2) - [Up: 248.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty.248.2) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty.248.2.1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.sultanate.tabaqat-i-nasiri~en-raverty.248.2.1) · Pramāṇa