[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Dark Ages](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages) › [Travellers (1500–1858)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel) › [Storia do Mogor](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci) › [Storia do Mogor (Irvine)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine) › 359.2.4 # Storia do Mogor 359.2.4 Storia do Mogor (Irvine) 359.2.4 - **Language:** English ### [359.2.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.359.2.4) Do they consider they did well to extort a Pastoral by pretexts and the use of calumny ? Do they think that his Holiness will approve the decision of the Lord Patriarch, which was given after he was told that this mission had applied to the Holy See, which was pronounced without the consent of the parties, which was not promulgated until two years afterwards ? Do they believe that the Lord Bishop of San Thome will be approved at Rome when his Holiness and the Sacred Congregation learn that his Lordship has acted formally against their orders ? Can they persuade themselves that my lord, after having written such a fulminating letter as that sent to your Council, will be absolved and acquitted by merely saying he had been misled ? Do they believe that he will not be cross-questioned as to why he was misled, why he sent the letter referred to, and how he came to know what he has imputed to the Capuchin fathers ? If they believe all that, then ' óculos habent et non videbunt, aures habent et non audient.' - [Previous: 359.2.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.359.2.3) - [Next: 359.2.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.359.2.5) - [Up: 359.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.359.2) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.359.2.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.359.2.4) · Pramāṇa