[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Dark Ages](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages) › [Travellers (1500–1858)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel) › [Storia do Mogor](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci) › [Storia do Mogor (Irvine)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine) › 359.2.8 # Storia do Mogor 359.2.8 Storia do Mogor (Irvine) 359.2.8 - **Language:** English ### [359.2.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.359.2.8) If any Capuchin of Madras had gone to Pondicherry, and had at once gone to visit the reverend Jesuit fathers, and the reverend Jesuit fathers had come to the Capuchins to see them, would the Capuchin fathers ever have \[238\] replied, ' We do not want to speak to him ' ? This is what was done by Father Dolu at Madras not a very long time ago. Finally, if the reverend Jesuit fathers had obtained a decision from Rome as we have done, would they have submitted to the Lord Bishop of San Thomé when he annulled what had been ordained by the Sacred Congregation, to whom his Lordship ought to submit just as much as we ? I know not, gentlemen, what you may think, but for my part I am quite certain that regulars who resist his Holiness and the Sacred Congregation face to face could have equally resisted a single bishop. - [Previous: 359.2.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.359.2.7) - [Next: 359.3.1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.359.3.1) - [Up: 359.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.359.2) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.359.2.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.359.2.8) · Pramāṇa