<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.362.3.6 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Dark Ages](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages) › [Travellers (1500–1858)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel) › [Storia do Mogor](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci) › [Storia do Mogor (Irvine)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine) › 362.3.6

# Storia do Mogor 362.3.6

Storia do Mogor (Irvine) 362.3.6

- **Language:** English

### [362.3.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.362.3.6)

'But I am assuming what cannot be—I mean that it should be requisite to have an order from Rome before putting into execution Bulls and Decrees received from Rome. Whence is it, then, that your Lordship has declared the Reverend Father Esprit to be excommunicated, while you have not carried out the order of the Sacred Congregation? I cannot see what reason there can be for doing the one and not the other. For, after all, if the decrees of the Sacred Congregation themselves are not enough to secure their execution, but require a separate order from the same Sacred Congregation for that purpose, it follows of necessity that when a priest or religious infringes on the jurisdiction of a bishop (a thing Father Esprit has never done), there must come a second order from Rome declaring him excommunicated. The reason is obvious. In the Bull "In Cœna Domini" it is provided that those who act contrary to the jurisdiction of bishops shall be held excommunicated; but it is also laid down in the decrees of the Sacred Congregation, which have been produced before your Lordship, that no person may on any pretext or show of authority whatsoever remove a cure from the religious of one Order and give it to those of another without previous reference to the aforesaid Sacred Congregation, the penalty for disobedience being "sub poena privationis officii, privilegii, et facultatis, ipso facto incurrenda, et cetera."'

- [Previous: 362.3.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.362.3.5)
- [Next: 362.3.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.362.3.7)
- [Up: 362.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.362.3)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.362.3.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darkages.travel.manucci~en-irvine.362.3.6) · Pramāṇa
