<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.darsana.all.sarvadarsanasangraha~en-mt.16.77 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Philosophy](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darsana) › [General works and doxographies](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darsana.all) › [Sarvadarśanasaṅgraha](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darsana.all.sarvadarsanasangraha) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darsana.all.sarvadarsanasangraha~en-mt) › 16.77

# Sarvadarshanasangraha 16.77

English (machine translation) 16.77

- **Language:** English

### [16.77](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darsana.all.sarvadarsanasangraha~en-mt.16.77)

To this, the reply is made: First of all, the apprehension of linguistic relation with respect to an established entity is not unestablished; because, according to the principle deduced earlier, the apprehension of linguistic relation is indeed established even from a sentence directed toward an established entity, such as “A son is born to you.” Nor should it be said that ascertainment by elimination is impossible because the safe delivery of a beloved wife and the like are also possible; for there is no indicator of the safe delivery of a beloved wife and the like, unlike the showing of a cloth marked with the word “son.” If you say that the birth of a son is itself that indicator, no:

- [Previous: 16.76](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darsana.all.sarvadarsanasangraha~en-mt.16.76)
- [Next: 16.78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darsana.all.sarvadarsanasangraha~en-mt.16.78)
- [Up: 16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darsana.all.sarvadarsanasangraha~en-mt.16)

## Linked texts (1)

- [Sarvadarśanasaṅgraha](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darsana.all.sarvadarsanasangraha.16.77) — Mādhava, Sanskrit

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.darsana.all.sarvadarsanasangraha~en-mt.16.77](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darsana.all.sarvadarsanasangraha~en-mt.16.77) · Pramāṇa
