Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

Aphorisms on Brahman 2.280

Brahmasūtrabhāṣya (Śārīrakamīmāṃsābhāṣya) 2.280

Language
Sanskrit

2.280.1

8 upasaṃhāradarśanādhikaraṇam. sū. 24-25

2.280.2

upasaṃhāradarśanān neti cen na kṣīravad dhi ||

If you object on the ground of the observation of the employment (of instruments); (we say), No; because as milk (transforms itself, so Brahman does).

George Thibaut 1890, The Vedânta-Sûtras with the Commentary by Śaṅkarâkârya (Sacred Books of the East 34, 38)

2.280.3

cetanaṃ brahmaikamadvitīyaṃ jagataḥ kāraṇamiti yaduktaṃ tannopapadyate /
kasmāt /
upasaṃhāradarśanāt /
iha hi loke kulālādayo ghaṭapaṭādīnāṃ kartāro mṛddaṇḍacakrasūtrādyanekakārakopasaṃhāreṇa saṃgṛhītasādhanāḥ santastattatkāryaṃ kurvāṇā dṛśyante /
brahma cāsahāyaṃ tavābhipretaṃ tasya sādhanāntarānupasaṃgrahe sati kathaṃ sraṣṭṛtvamupapadyeta /
tasmānna brahma jagatkāraṇamiti cet /

Your assertion that the intelligent Brahman alone, without a second, is the cause of the world cannot be maintained, on account of the observation of employment (of instruments). For in ordinary life we see that potters, weavers, and other handicraftsmen produce jars, cloth, and the like, after having put themselves in possession of the means thereto by providing themselves with various implements, such as clay, staffs, wheels, string, &c.; Brahman, on the other hand, you conceive to be without any help; how then can it act as a creator without providing itself with instruments to work with? We therefore maintain that Brahman is not the cause of the world.

George Thibaut 1890, The Vedânta-Sûtras with the Commentary by Śaṅkarâkârya (Sacred Books of the East 34, 38)

2.280.4

naiṣa doṣaḥ /
yataḥ kṣīravaddravyasvabhāvaviśeṣādupapadyate /
yathā hi loke kṣīraṃ jalaṃ vā svayameva dadhihimabhāvena pariṇamate 'napekṣya bāhyaṃ sādhanaṃ tathehāpi bhaviṣyati /

This objection is not valid, because causation is possible in consequence of a peculiar constitution of the causal substance, as in the case of milk. Just as milk and water turn into curds and ice respectively, without any extraneous means, so it is in the case of Brahman also. And if you object to this analogy for the reason that milk, in order to turn into curds, does require an extraneous agent, viz. heat, we reply that milk by itself also undergoes a certain amount of definite change, and that its turning is merely accelerated by heat. If milk did not possess that capability of itself, heat could not compel it to turn; for we see that air or ether, for instance, is not compelled by the action of heat to turn into sour milk. By the co-operation of auxiliary means the milk's capability of turning into sour milk is merely completed. The absolutely complete power of Brahman, on the other hand, does not require to be supplemented by any extraneous help. Thus Scripture also declares, 'There is no effect and no instrument known of him, no one is seen like unto him or better; his high power is revealed as manifold, as inherent, acting as force and knowledge' (Sve. Up. VI, 8). Therefore Brahman, although one only, is, owing to its manifold powers, able to transform itself into manifold effects; just as milk is.

George Thibaut 1890, The Vedânta-Sûtras with the Commentary by Śaṅkarâkârya (Sacred Books of the East 34, 38)

2.280.5

nanu kṣīrādyapi dadhyādibhāvena pariṇāmamānapekṣata eva bāhyaṃ sādhanamauṣṇyādikaṃ kathamucyate kṣīravaddhīti /

This objection is not valid, because causation is possible in consequence of a peculiar constitution of the causal substance, as in the case of milk. Just as milk and water turn into curds and ice respectively, without any extraneous means, so it is in the case of Brahman also. And if you object to this analogy for the reason that milk, in order to turn into curds, does require an extraneous agent, viz. heat, we reply that milk by itself also undergoes a certain amount of definite change, and that its turning is merely accelerated by heat. If milk did not possess that capability of itself, heat could not compel it to turn; for we see that air or ether, for instance, is not compelled by the action of heat to turn into sour milk. By the co-operation of auxiliary means the milk's capability of turning into sour milk is merely completed. The absolutely complete power of Brahman, on the other hand, does not require to be supplemented by any extraneous help. Thus Scripture also declares, 'There is no effect and no instrument known of him, no one is seen like unto him or better; his high power is revealed as manifold, as inherent, acting as force and knowledge' (Sve. Up. VI, 8). Therefore Brahman, although one only, is, owing to its manifold powers, able to transform itself into manifold effects; just as milk is.

George Thibaut 1890, The Vedânta-Sûtras with the Commentary by Śaṅkarâkârya (Sacred Books of the East 34, 38)

2.280.6

naiṣa doṣaḥ /
svayamapi hi kṣīraṃ yāṃ ca yāvatīṃ ca pariṇāmamātramanubhavati tāvatyeva tvāryate tvauṣṇyādinā dadhibhāvāya /
yadi ca svayaṃ dadhibhāvaśīlatā na syānnaivauṣṇyādināpi balāddadhibhāvamāpadyeta /
nahi vāyurākāśo vauṣṇyadinā balāddadhibhāvamāpadyate /
sādanasāmagryā ca tasya pūrṇatā saṃpādyate /
paripūrṇaśaktikaṃ tu brahma /
na tasyānyena kenacitpūrṇatā saṃpādayitavyā /
śrutiśca bhavati- 'na tasya kāryaṃ kāraṇaṃ ca vidyate na tatsamaścābhyadhikaśca dṛśyate /
parāsya śaktirvividhaiva śrūyate svābhāvikī jñānabalakriyā ca //

This objection is not valid, because causation is possible in consequence of a peculiar constitution of the causal substance, as in the case of milk. Just as milk and water turn into curds and ice respectively, without any extraneous means, so it is in the case of Brahman also. And if you object to this analogy for the reason that milk, in order to turn into curds, does require an extraneous agent, viz. heat, we reply that milk by itself also undergoes a certain amount of definite change, and that its turning is merely accelerated by heat. If milk did not possess that capability of itself, heat could not compel it to turn; for we see that air or ether, for instance, is not compelled by the action of heat to turn into sour milk. By the co-operation of auxiliary means the milk's capability of turning into sour milk is merely completed. The absolutely complete power of Brahman, on the other hand, does not require to be supplemented by any extraneous help. Thus Scripture also declares, 'There is no effect and no instrument known of him, no one is seen like unto him or better; his high power is revealed as manifold, as inherent, acting as force and knowledge' (Sve. Up. VI, 8). Therefore Brahman, although one only, is, owing to its manifold powers, able to transform itself into manifold effects; just as milk is.

George Thibaut 1890, The Vedânta-Sûtras with the Commentary by Śaṅkarâkârya (Sacred Books of the East 34, 38)

2.280.7

' (śve. 6.2) iti /
tasmādekasyāpi brahmaṇo vicitraśaktiyogātkṣīrādivadvicitrapariṇāma upapadyate // 24 //

Translations (1)

Commentaries (8)

Linked texts (1)