<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5.10.3 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Jain Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina) › [The Śvetāmbara canon (Siddhānta)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta) › [The twelve Aṅgas ("limbs")](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga) › [Viyahapannatti](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5) › 10.3

# Viyahapannatti 10.3: Uddeśaka 3: ātmaṛddhi

Viyāhapannatti 10.3

- **Language:** Ardhamāgadhī Prakrit

### Uddeśaka 3: ātmaṛddhi

### [10.3.482](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5.10.3.482)

rāyagihe jāva evaṃ vayāsī–āiḍḍhīe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! deve jāva cattāri, paṃca devāvāsaṃtarāiṃ vītikkaṃte, teṇa paraṃ pariḍḍhīe?  
haṃtā goyamā! āiḍḍhīe ṇaṃ deve jāva cattāri, paṃca devāvāsaṃtarāiṃ vītikkaṃte, teṇa paraṃ pariḍḍhīe| evaṃ asurakumāre vi, navaraṃ–asurakumārāvāsaṃtarāiṃ, sesaṃ taṃ ceva| evaṃ eeṇaṃ kameṇaṃ jāva thaṇiyakumāre, evaṃ vāṇamaṃtare, joisie vemāṇie jāva teṇa paraṃ pariḍḍhīe|  
appiḍḍhīe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! deve mahiḍḍhiyassa devassa majjhaṃmajjheṇaṃ vīivaejjā? no iṇaṭṭhe samaṭṭhe|  
samiḍḍhīe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! deve samiḍḍhīyassa devassa majjhaṃmajjheṇaṃ vīivaejjā?  
no iṇaṭṭhe samaṭṭhe, pamattaṃ puṇa vīivaejjā|  
se bhaṃte! kiṃ vimohittā pabhū? avimohittā pabhū?  
goyamā! vimohittā pabhū, no avimohittā pabhū|  
se bhaṃte! kiṃ puvviṃ vimohittā pacchā vīivaejjā? puvviṃ vīivaittā pacchā vimohejjā?  
goyamā! puvviṃ vimohittā pacchā vīivaejjā, no puvviṃ vīivaittā pacchā vimohejjā|  
mahiḍḍhīe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! deve appiḍḍhiyassa devassa majjhaṃmajjheṇaṃ vīivaejjā?  
haṃtā vīivaejjā|  
se bhaṃte! kiṃ vimohittā pabhū? avimohittā pabhū?  
goyamā! vimohittā vi pabhū, avimohittā vi pabhū|  
se bhaṃte! kiṃ puvviṃ vimohittā pacchā vīivaejjā? puvviṃ vīivaittā pacchā vimohejjā?  
goyamā! puvviṃ vā vimohettā pacchā vīivaejjā, puvviṃ vā vīivaittā pacchā vimohejjā|  
appiḍḍhie ṇaṃ bhaṃte! asurakumāre mahiḍḍhiyassa asurakumārassa majjhaṃmajjheṇaṃ vīivaejjā?  
no iṇaṭṭhe samaṭṭhe| evaṃ asurakumāreṇa vi tinni ālāvagā bhāṇiyavvā jahā ohieṇaṃ deveṇaṃ bhaṇiyā| evaṃ jāva thaṇiyakumāreṇaṃ| vāṇamaṃtara-joisiya-vemāṇieṇaṃ evaṃ ceva|  
appiḍḍhie ṇaṃ bhaṃte! deve mahiḍḍhiyāe devīe majjhaṃmajjheṇaṃ vīivaejjā?  
no iṇaṭṭhe samaṭṭhe|  
samiḍḍhie ṇaṃ bhaṃte! deve samiḍḍhiyāe devīe majjhaṃmajjheṇaṃ vīivaejjā?  
evaṃ taheva deveṇa ya devīe ya daṃḍao bhāṇiyavvo jāva vemāṇiyāe|  
appiḍḍhiyā ṇaṃ bhaṃte! devī mahiḍḍhiyassa devassa majjhaṃmajjheṇaṃ vīivaejjā?  
evaṃ eso vi tatio daṃḍao bhāṇiyavvo jāva–  
mahiḍḍhiyā vemāṇiṇī appiḍḍhiyassa vemāniyassa majjhaṃmajjheṇaṃ vīivaejjā?  
haṃtā vīivaejjā|  
appiḍḍhiyā ṇaṃ bhaṃte! devī mahiḍḍhiyāe devīe majjhaṃmajjheṇaṃ vīivaejjā?  
no iṇaṭṭhe samaṭṭhe| evaṃ samiḍḍhiyā devī samiḍḍhiyāe devīe taheva| mahiḍḍhiyā vi devī appiḍḍhiyāe devīe taheva| evaṃ ekkekke tinni-tinni ālāvagā bhāṇiyavvā jāva–  
mahiḍḍhiyā ṇaṃ bhaṃte! vemāṇiṇī appiḍḍhiyāe vemāṇiṇīe majjhaṃmajjheṇaṃ vīivaejjā?  
haṃtā vīivaejjā|  
sā bhaṃte! kiṃ vimohittā pabhū? avimohittā pabhū?  
goyamā! vimohittā vi pabhū, avimohittā vi pabhū| taheva jāva puvviṃ vā vīivaittā pacchā vimohejjā| ee cattāri daṃḍagā|

> At Rājagṛha, and so on, \[Gautama\] spoke thus:  
> "Venerable Sir, does a god, by his own supernatural power, cross up to four or five intervening divine abodes, and beyond that by another's power?"  
> "Yes, Gautama, a god, by his own supernatural power, crosses up to four or five intervening divine abodes, and beyond that by another's power. Likewise also for an Asurakumāra, with the only difference being: intervening abodes of the Asurakumāras; the rest is just the same. In this order, up to the Stanitakumāras; likewise for the Vāṇamantaras, Jyotiṣkas, and Vaimānikas, up to: beyond that by another's power."  
> "Venerable Sir, could a god of little power pass through the very midst of a god of great power?"  
> "That meaning is not tenable."  
> "Venerable Sir, could a god of equal power pass through the very midst of a god of equal power?"  
> "That meaning is not tenable; however, \[if the other is\] negligent, he could pass through."  
> "Venerable Sir, is he able \[to do so\] having bewitched \[him\], or is he able without bewitching \[him\]?"  
> "Gautama, he is able having bewitched \[him\], not without bewitching \[him\]."  
> "Venerable Sir, would he pass through after having bewitched \[him\] first, or would he bewitch \[him\] after having passed through first?"  
> "Gautama, he would pass through after having bewitched \[him\] first, not bewitch \[him\] after having passed through first."  
> "Venerable Sir, could a god of great power pass through the very midst of a god of little power?"  
> "Yes, he could pass through."  
> "Venerable Sir, is he able \[to do so\] having bewitched \[him\], or is he able without bewitching \[him\]?"  
> "Gautama, he is able having bewitched \[him\], and also able without bewitching \[him\]."  
> "Venerable Sir, would he pass through after having bewitched \[him\] first, or would he bewitch \[him\] after having passed through first?"  
> "Gautama, either he would pass through after having bewitched \[him\] first, or he would bewitch \[him\] after having passed through first."  
> "Venerable Sir, could an Asurakumāra of little power pass through the very midst of an Asurakumāra of great power?"  
> "That meaning is not tenable." In this way, three statements are also to be recited for an Asurakumāra just as they were stated for a general god. In this way up to the Stanitakumāras. For the Vāṇamantaras, Jyotiṣkas, and Vaimānikas, it is just the same.  
> "Venerable Sir, could a god of little power pass through the very midst of a goddess of great power?"  
> "That meaning is not tenable."  
> "Venerable Sir, could a god of equal power pass through the very midst of a goddess of equal power?"  
> In this way, the series regarding a god and a goddess is likewise to be recited, up to a Vaimānika goddess.  
> "Venerable Sir, could a goddess of little power pass through the very midst of a god of great power?"  
> In this way, this third series is also to be recited, up to:  
> "Could a Vaimānika goddess of great power pass through the very midst of a Vaimānika god of little power?"  
> "Yes, she could pass through."  
> "Venerable Sir, could a goddess of little power pass through the very midst of a goddess of great power?"  
> "That meaning is not tenable." Likewise a goddess of equal power with a goddess of equal power; likewise also a goddess of great power with a goddess of little power. In this way, three statements are to be recited for each one, up to:  
> "Venerable Sir, could a Vaimānika goddess of great power pass through the very midst of a Vaimānika goddess of little power?"  
> "Yes, she could pass through."  
> "Venerable Sir, is she able \[to do so\] having bewitched \[her\], or is she able without bewitching \[her\]?"  
> "Gautama, she is able having bewitched \[her\], and also able without bewitching \[her\], likewise up to: or she would bewitch \[her\] after having passed through first. These are the four series.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

### [10.3.483](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5.10.3.483)

āsassa ṇaṃ bhaṃte! dhāvamāṇassa kiṃ khu-khu tti kareti?  
goyamā! āsassa ṇaṃ dhāvamāṇassa hiyayassa ya jagassa ya aṃtarā ettha ṇaṃ kakkaḍae nāmaṃ vāe saṃmucchai, jeṇaṃ āsassa dhāvamāṇassa khu-khu tti kareti|

> "Venerable Sir, why does a running horse make the sound 'khu-khu'?"  
> "Gautama, between the heart and the liver of a running horse, there an air called karkaṭaka forms, because of which a running horse makes the sound 'khu-khu'."  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

### [10.3.484](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5.10.3.484)

aha bhaṃte! āsaissāmo, saissāmo, ciṭṭhissāmo, nisiissāmo, tuyaṭṭissāmo–pannavaṇī ṇaṃ esa bhāyā? na esā bhāsā mosā?  
haṃtā goyamā! āsaissāmo, saissāmo, ciṭṭhissāmo, nisiissāmo, tuyaṭṭissāmo–pannavaṇī ṇaṃ esā bhāsā, na esā bhāsā mosā|  
sevaṃ bhaṃte! sevaṃ bhaṃte! tti|

> "Now, Venerable Sir, \[saying\] 'we will sit, we will lie down, we will stand, we will sit down, we will recline'—is this expository speech? Is this speech not false?"  
> "Yes, Gautama, \[saying\] 'we will sit, we will lie down, we will stand, we will sit down, we will recline'—this speech is expository; this speech is not false."  
> "So it is, Venerable Sir! So it is, Venerable Sir!"  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

### [10.3.485](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5.10.3.485)

āmaṃtaṇi āṇamaṇī jāyaṇi taha pucchaṇī ya pannavaṇī|  
paccakkhāṇī bhāsā bhāsā icchāṇulomā ya ||

> Inviting, commanding, begging, and likewise questioning, and expository,  
> renouncing speech, and speech conforming to desire,  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

### [10.3.486](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5.10.3.486)

aṇabhiggahiyā bhāsā bhāsā ya abhiggahammi bodhavvā|  
saṃsayakaraṇī bhāsā voyaḍa mavvoyaḍā ceva ||

> uncommitted speech, and speech to be understood as committed,  
> speech producing doubt, explicit, and also non-explicit.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

## Translations (3)

- [Viyāhapannatti: Hindi translation (Dīparatnasāgara, 2019)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5~hi-deepratnasagar2019.10.3.482) — Hindi
- [Viyāhapannatti: Gujarati translation (Dīparatnasāgara, 2020)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5~gu-deepratnasagar2020.10.3.482) — Gujarati
- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5~en-mt.10.3.482) — English, machine translation

## Commentaries (2)

- [Viyāhapannatti: ṭīkānusārī vivecana](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5!deepratnasagar.726) — Muni Dīparatnasāgara 2000, Gujarati
- [Bhagavatīvṛtti](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5!abhayadeva.v5.p537) — Abhayadeva Sūri, Sanskrit

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5.10.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.jaina.sveta.anga.5.10.3) · Pramāṇa
