[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Polity, Pleasure & Law](https://indike.org/pramana/in.niti) › [Law and Social-Religious Duty](https://indike.org/pramana/in.niti.dharma) › [Mānava Dharmaśāstra](https://indike.org/pramana/in.niti.dharma.manu) › [Manubhashya](https://indike.org/pramana/in.niti.dharma.manu!medhatithi) › 3.78 # Manava Dharmashastra 3.78 Manubhāṣya 3.78 - **Language:** Sanskrit ### [3.78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.niti.dharma.manu!medhatithi.3.78) atretikaraṇaḥ rūpavivakṣārthaḥ | adbhiravatyadhikaraṇam | adbhūya iti devatānardeśaḥ | 'vanaspatibhya iti musalolūkhale | dvandvaikavadbhāve na vikalpitamādhāradvayam | nirdeśe guṇavṛttyā pradhānabhūtāyā āhuterāvṛttiryuktā' | na ca musalolūkhalasyaikīkṛtasyāhutisambandhaḥ śakyaḥ kartuṃ, pṛthaktvasya tatrāpyupalambhāt | na hi kṣīrodakavat anayonyamiśraṇasambhavaḥ | tatra yadyulūkhale kriyate netaratra homaḥ kṛtaḥ, atholūkhale na musale | na ca bhāgaśa āhutiḥ sambhavati niyataparimāṇatvāt | dvandvanirdeśe'tra saṃyuktayoranyataratra homo yuktaḥ | > Saying “this to the Maruts,” he should make an offering at the door; also one in water, saying, “this to the Apas;” and he should hake an offering on the pestle and mortar, saying, “this to the Vanaspatis.”—(88) > — Ganganatha Jha 1920, Manu-Smṛti: The Laws of Manu with the Bhāṣya of Medhātithi > Medhātithi’s commentary (manubhāṣya): > The particle ‘iti’ is meant to lay stress upon the exact form of the words to be used. > — Ganganatha Jha 1920, Manu-Smṛti: The Laws of Manu with the Bhāṣya of Medhātithi > ‘In water’—this specifies the receptacle of the offering; and ‘to Apas’ indicates the deity to whom the offering is to be made. > — Ganganatha Jha 1920, Manu-Smṛti: The Laws of Manu with the Bhāṣya of Medhātithi > ‘Saying “this to Vanaspatis,” on the pestle and mortar; the singular number in the Copulative Compound ‘musalolūkhale’ would indicate that the two things are not two optional alternative receptacles; and, since two receptacles are mentioned, the right. course would appear to be that there should be a repetition of the oblation, which is the principal factor; specially, as it is not possible for the pestle and the mortar to be unified and then serve as a receptacle for the offering; as the two will ever remain distinct; they can never be mixed up like milk and water; so that if the oblation is poured on the mortar, it is not poured on the pestle; and if it is poured on the pestle, it is not poured on the mortar; nor is it possible for the oblation to be poured in parts (over the two receptacles); as the exact quantity of the oblation has been fixed by law. With all this, in view of the copulative compound, it appears best that the oblation should be poured on one of the two things mentioned (i.e., either on the pestle or on the mortar).—(88) > — Ganganatha Jha 1920, Manu-Smṛti: The Laws of Manu with the Bhāṣya of Medhātithi - [Previous: 3.77](https://indike.org/pramana/in.niti.dharma.manu!medhatithi.3.77) - [Next: 3.79](https://indike.org/pramana/in.niti.dharma.manu!medhatithi.3.79) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.niti.dharma.manu!medhatithi.3) ## Translations (1) - [Manu-Smṛti: The Laws of Manu with the Bhāṣya of Medhātithi](https://indike.org/pramana/in.niti.dharma.manu!medhatithi~en-jha.3.88.p1) — Ganganatha Jha 1920, English ## Linked texts (1) - [Mānava Dharmaśāstra](https://indike.org/pramana/in.niti.dharma.manu.3.78) — Manu & Bhṛgu, Sanskrit --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.niti.dharma.manu!medhatithi.3.78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.niti.dharma.manu!medhatithi.3.78) · Pramāṇa