[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Auxiliary Sciences of the Veda](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga) › [Grammar](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana) › [Topical rearrangements of Pāṇini](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya) › [Vaiyākaraṇasiddhāntakaumudī](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi) › [Prauḍhamanoramā](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama~en-mt) › 60\_314 # Praudhamanorama 60\_314 English (machine translation) 60\_314 - **Language:** English ### [60\_314](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama~en-mt.60_314) As for the analytical paraphrase formulated by the older grammarian: 'born in the southern direction'—that is not correct, because in the prescription of \*tyak\*, owing to association with indeclinables, only the word \*dakṣiṇā\* ending in \*āc\* is grasped; and otherwise, because of the rule "\*sarvanāmno vṛttimātre\*", treating \[it\] like a masculine form would result. As for the claim that treating like a masculine occurs only in a compound, that is not so, as will be explained. When \*tyak\* is attached, after \*vṛddhi\* by "\*kiti ca\*" etc., there is \*ṭāp\*, and then \*ka\* in the sense of unknown, etc. By "\*ke'ṇaḥ\*" there is shortening, then \*ṭāp\*. On "\*ihatyikā\*": \[Derived by\] "\*avyayātyap\*" \[P. 4.2.104\]. On \*na yāsayoḥ\* (P. 7.3.45): Here the author of the Nyāsa says: when the option by "\*udīcāmātaḥ sthāne\*" applies to \*yā\*, this is a prohibition \[of it\]. That is not correct, because the part "\*ātaḥ sthāne\*" does not apply here. With the intention that \*yā\* and \*sā\* are indirect indications of \*yad\* and \*tad\*, he says: "of \*yad\* and \*tad\*". When the own form is not intended to be expressed, he gives an example of the result: \*yakām\*, \*takām\*. Setting aside \*yāsayoḥ\*, it would be proper to say simply \*yattadoḥ\*. - [Previous: 60\_313](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama~en-mt.60_313) - [Next: 60\_315](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama~en-mt.60_315) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama~en-mt.60_314](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama~en-mt.60_314) · Pramāṇa