[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Auxiliary Sciences of the Veda](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga) › [Grammar](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana) › [Topical rearrangements of Pāṇini](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya) › [Vaiyākaraṇasiddhāntakaumudī](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi) › [Prauḍhamanoramā](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama~en-mt) › p202 # Praudhamanorama p202 English (machine translation) p202 - **Language:** English ### [p202](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama~en-mt.p202) \[On\] 'oto ṇiditi vācyam' (one should say that \[an affix\] following o is treated as having an indicatory letter ṇ): the meaning is that one should say 'otaḥ', discarding 'gotaḥ'. And thus, raising the objection that, since vṛddhi would prevail by being subsequent in 'gām', the substitution of ā would not occur, the Bhāṣyakāra stated under the rule 'auto'mśasoḥ' (Pāṇini 6.1.93) that vṛddhi is barred by the substitution of ā because \[the latter\] is without any other scope. Kaiyaṭa also says there: 'It should be read in the rule as otaḥ, or gotaḥ should be explained as an implied indication of an o-ending.' \[On\] 'smṛtau': as for what \[some\] say—'By the word go, through resemblance to an uṇādi stem, only the word dyo is implied, not anything ending in o in general; therefore only the forms smṛtoḥ, smṛtavau, smṛtavaḥ occur'—that contradicts the Mahābhāṣya. For if treating \[an affix\] as having an indicatory letter ṇ were accepted only after go and dyo, then 'smṛtām' and the like would be the scope of the substitution of ā by 'auto'mśasoḥ'; and thus, since vṛddhi in 'gām' would be unavoidable by being subsequent, the barring power and the absence of other scope of the substitution of ā stated in the cited Mahābhāṣya would not hold. This is the guiding principle. .. Thus end the stems ending in o .. - [Previous: p201](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama~en-mt.p201) - [Next: p203](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama~en-mt.p203) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama~en-mt.p202](https://indike.org/pramana/in.vedanga.vyakarana.prakriya.siddhantakaumudi!praudhamanorama~en-mt.p202) · Pramāṇa