<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/inf.gr.roman.strabo.2.1.27 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Foreign](https://indike.org/pramana/inf) › [Greek](https://indike.org/pramana/inf.gr) › [Roman Imperial (31 BCE – 330 CE)](https://indike.org/pramana/inf.gr.roman) › [Γεωγραφικά](https://indike.org/pramana/inf.gr.roman.strabo) › 2.1.27

# Γεωγραφικά 2.1.27

Γεωγραφικά 2.1.27

- **Language:** Ancient Greek

### [2.1.27](https://indike.org/pramana/inf.gr.roman.strabo.2.1.27)

περὶ δὲ τῆς τρίτης σφραγῖδος καὶ ἄλλα μέν τινα ἁμαρτήματα ποιεῖ, περὶ ὧν ἐπισκεψόμεθα, ἃ δὲ Ἵππαρχος προφέρει αὐτῷ, οὐ πάνυ. σκοπῶμεν δʼ ἃ λέγει. βουλόμενος γὰρ βεβαιοῦν τὸ ἐξ ἀρχῆς, ὅτι οὐ μεταθετέον τὴν Ἰνδικὴν ἐπὶ τὰ νοτιώτερα, ὥσπερ Ἐρατοσθένης ἀξιοῖ, σαφὲς ἂν γενέσθαι τοῦτο μάλιστά φησιν ἐξ ὧν αὐτὸς ἐκεῖνος προφέρεται· τὴν γὰρ τρίτην μερίδα κατὰ τὴν βόρειον πλευρὰν εἰπόντα ἀφορίζεσθαι ὑπὸ τῆς ἀπὸ Κασπίων πυλῶν ἐπὶ τὸν Εὐφράτην γραμμῆς σταδίων μυρίων οὔσης, μετὰ ταῦτα ἐπιφέρειν ὅτι τὸ νότιον πλευρὸν τὸ ἀπὸ Βαβυλῶνος εἰς τοὺς ὅρους τῆς Καρμανίας μικρῷ πλειόνων ἐστὶν ἢ ἐνακισχιλίων, τὸ δὲ πρὸς δύσει πλευρὸν ἀπὸ Θαψάκου παρὰ τὸν Εὐφράτην ἐστὶν εἰς Βαβυλῶνα τετρακισχίλιοι ὀκτακόσιοι στάδιοι, καὶ ἑξῆς ἐπὶ τὰς ἐκβολὰς τρισχίλιοι, τὰ δὲ πρὸς ἄρκτον ἀπὸ Θαψάκου τὸ μὲν ἀπομεμέτρηται μέχρι χιλίων ἑκατόν, τὸ λοιπὸν δʼ οὐκέτι. ἐπεὶ τοίνυν φησί τὸ μὲν βόρειόν ἐστι πλευρὸν τῆς τρίτης μερίδος ὡς μυρίων, ἡ δὲ τούτῳ παράλληλος ἀπὸ Βαβυλῶνος εὐθεῖα μέχρι ἀνατολικοῦ πλευροῦ συνελογίσθη μικρῷ πλειόνων ἢ ἐνακισχιλίων, δῆλον ὅτι ἡ Βαβυλὼν οὐ πολλῷ πλείοσιν ἢ χιλίοις σταδίοις ἐστὶν ἀνατολικωτέρα τῆς κατὰ Θάψακον διαβάσεως.

> In the Third Section it is true he does make some mistakes, which we shall take into consideration; but they are nothing like the amount which Hipparchus attributes to him. However, we will examine his objections. \[In the first place,\] he would have the ancient charts left just as they are, and by no means India brought more to the south, as Eratosthenes thinks proper. Indeed, he asserts that the very arguments adduced by that writer only confirm him the more in his opinion. He says, According to Eratosthenes, the northern side of the third section is bounded by a line of 10,000 stadia drawn from the Caspian Gates to the Euphrates, the southern side from Babylon to the confines of Carmania is a little more than 9000 stadia. On the western side, following the course of the Euphrates, from Thapsacus to Babylon there are 4800 stadia, and thence to the outlets of the river 3000 stadia more. Northward from Thapsacus \[to the Gates of Armenia\] is reckoned 1100 stadia; the rest has not been measured. Now since Eratosthenes says that the northern side of this Third Section is about 10,000 stadia, and that the right line parallel thereto drawn from Babylon to the eastern side is computed at just above 9000 stadia, it follows that Babylon is not much more than 1000 stadia east of the passage of \[the Euphrates\] near Thapsacus.  
> — Hans Claude Hamilton & William Falconer 1854, The Geography of Strabo

- [Previous: 2.1.26](https://indike.org/pramana/inf.gr.roman.strabo.2.1.26)
- [Next: 2.1.28](https://indike.org/pramana/inf.gr.roman.strabo.2.1.28)
- [Up: 2.1](https://indike.org/pramana/inf.gr.roman.strabo.2.1)

## Translations (2)

- [The Geography of Strabo](https://indike.org/pramana/inf.gr.roman.strabo~en-hamilton-falconer.2.1.27) — Hans Claude Hamilton & William Falconer 1854, English
- [Ancient India as Described in Classical Literature (Strabo, book 15)](https://indike.org/pramana/inf.gr.roman.strabo~en-mccrindle.2.1.27) — John Watson McCrindle 1901, English

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/inf.gr.roman.strabo.2.1.27](https://indike.org/pramana/inf.gr.roman.strabo.2.1.27) · Pramāṇa
