<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.art.smith-1911.c7.23 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Architecture and art](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.art) › [A History of Fine Art in India and Ceylon, from the Earliest Times to the Present Day](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.art.smith-1911) › c7.23

# A History of Fine Art in India and Ceylon, from the Earliest Times to the Present Day c7.23

A History of Fine Art in India and Ceylon, from the Earliest Times to the Present Day c7.23

- **Language:** English

### [c7.23](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.art.smith-1911.c7.23)

The magnitude of the change of opinion now in progress may be estimated from the language of the protest signed by thirteen aesthetic experts and published in the \*Times\* on February 28, 1910, as a counterblast to Sir George Birdwood's outburst at the Royal Society of Arts¹:—

- [Previous: c7.22](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.art.smith-1911.c7.22)
- [Next: c7.24](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.art.smith-1911.c7.24)
- [Up: c7](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.art.smith-1911.c7)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.art.smith-1911.c7.23](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.art.smith-1911.c7.23) · Pramāṇa
