[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Archaeology, epigraphy and coins](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.epigraphy) › [Book of Indian Eras, with Tables for Calculating Indian Dates](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.epigraphy.cunningham-1883) › c2.49 # Book of Indian Eras, with Tables for Calculating Indian Dates c2.49 Book of Indian Eras, with Tables for Calculating Indian Dates c2.49 - **Language:** English ### [c2.49](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.epigraphy.cunningham-1883.c2.49) With reference to the intercalary months of the Hindu luni-solar year, I may mention that there is a great divergence between the published lists of Jervis and Cowasjee Patell.‡ At page 91 I have quoted the native rule as given by Warren and Prinsep, and the following example will show that the table published by Jervis is certainly wrong: - [Previous: c2.48](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.epigraphy.cunningham-1883.c2.48) - [Next: c2.50](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.epigraphy.cunningham-1883.c2.50) - [Up: c2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.epigraphy.cunningham-1883.c2) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.epigraphy.cunningham-1883.c2.49](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.epigraphy.cunningham-1883.c2.49) · Pramāṇa