[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [General history and culture](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general) › [The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882) › c8.s16.131 # The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c8.s16.131 The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c8.s16.131 - **Language:** English ### [c8.s16.131](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s16.131) ⁴ The following instances are in accordance with this:—(1) In an inscription at the temple of Gachchina-Basappa at Aṇṇigere in the Dhârwâr District (\*Carn.-Désa Inscrs.\* Vol. II. p. 289; verified from an ink-impression), the Piṅgaḷa \*samvatsara\* (\*Śaka-Samvat\* 1120 current) is cited as his seventh year; the month is Mârgaśîrsha. (2) In the inscription, mentioned above, at the temple of Amṛitêśvara at Aṇṇigere (\*ibid.\* p. 301; verified from an ink-impression), the Dundubhi \*samvatsara\* (\*Ś.-S.\* 1126 current) is cited as his twelfth year; the month is Jyêshṭha. (3) In an inscription at Baḷagânve in Mysore (P. S. and O.-C. \*Insers.\* No. 197; \*Mysore Inscriptions\*, p. 137), the Krôdhana \*samvatsara\* (\*Ś.-S.\* 1128 current) is cited as his fifteenth year; the month is Chaitra. (4) In another inscription at Baḷagânve (P. S. and O.-C. \*Insers.\* No. 198; \*Mysore Inscriptions\*, p. 137), the Prabhava \*samvatsara\* (\*Ś.-S.\* 1130 current) is cited as his seventeenth year; the month is Kârttika. And (5) in an inscription at the temple of Mahâbalêśvara at Nâgâvi in the Dhârwâr District (\*Carn.-Désa Insers.\* Vol. II. p. 334), the Prajâpati \*samvatsara\* (\*Ś.-S.\* 1134 current) is cited as his twenty-first year; the month is Kârttika.—I expect that the majority of his dates will be found to be in accordance with the above. But two instances to the contrary are known to me. In an inscription - [Previous: c8.s16.130](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s16.130) - [Next: c8.s16.132](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s16.132) - [Up: c8.s16](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s16) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s16.131](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s16.131) · Pramāṇa