[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [General history and culture](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general) › [The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882) › c8.s16.68.3 # The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c8.s16.68.3 The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c8.s16.68.3 - **Language:** English ### [c8.s16.68.3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s16.68.3) 1137³ further claims that he squeezed, as if he held it in his hand, the southern Madhurapura, and that, by means of his general, he burnt Jananâthapura, \*i.e.\* Mâyilaṅgai, the modern Mâliṅgi, opposite Talakâḍ, on the other side of the river.⁴ A later record, of A. D. 1159-60,⁵ states that, with the dust of his army of foot-soldiers, he made muddy the waters of the Malaprahâriṇî, which is the modern Malaprabhâ or Malparbhâ, flowing through the south of the Belgaum District and along the north of the Nawaḷgund and Rôṇ tâlukas of Dhârwâr; and that, from east to west, he acquired by his sword the whole of the territory that was bounded on the north by the Kṛishṇaveṇî, \*i.e.\* the Kṛishṇa, into which the Malparbhâ flows at Kapila-Saṅgam in the Bijâpur District. And another later record, of A. D. 1192,⁶ says much the same thing, in stating that he invaded all the territory from his own abode up to the Belvola country, and washed his horse in the Kṛishṇaveṇâ; and it adds that, recognising that, among all princes, the Hoysala was the most impracticable to deal with, Permâḍi, \*i.e.\* the Western Châlukya king Vikramâditya VI., treated Vishṇuvardhana with just the same respectful behaviour which Vishṇuvardhana displayed towards himself. When he thus carried his arms as far as the Kṛishṇa, he seems to have been in conflict, not so much with Vikramâditya VI. himself, who is recognised in the records as his paramount sovereign, as with the Sinda feudatories of the Western Châlukya king. - [Previous: c8.s16.68.2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s16.68.2) - [Next: c8.s16.68.4](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s16.68.4) - [Up: c8.s16.68](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s16.68) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s16.68.3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s16.68.3) · Pramāṇa