[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [General history and culture](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general) › [The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882) › c8.s8.13 # The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c8.s8.13 The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c8.s8.13 - **Language:** English ### [c8.s8.13](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s8.13) ∗ Though by using General Cunningham's table, I arrive at the desired result in three cases, still I now find that his current Christian year is derived by adding 78 to the past S'aka, while I have added 79; i.e., the cyclic year given in the dates is true not of the Gupta year in the date as a past year but of the Gupta year + 1 as a past year. And the third date 173 Gupta is a correction of General Cunningham's, the actual date in the inscription being 163. I have, however, allowed the paragraphs to remain, as I am by no means quite satisfied that the question of these cyclic dates is settled beyond dispute (1894). - [Previous: c8.s8.12](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s8.12) - [Next: c8.s8.14](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s8.14) - [Up: c8.s8](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s8) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s8.13](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c8.s8.13) · Pramāṇa